 |
Exposition of the Doctrines of Grace
nos. 385-88.
Thursday, April 11th, 1861.
EDITOR'S NOTE: These messages are part of the inaugural ceremonies held at the Metropolitan Tabernacle, London, when it first opened. Spurgeon had already preached the first sermons there, beginning March 25, while the building was not yet quite finished. This, however, was the official opening ceremony, and Spurgeon presided, choosing several fellow pastors to expound the doctrines of Calvinism. This guide is offered the reader wishing to follow the familiar TULIP acronym:
|
The Rev. C. H. SPURGEON took the chair at 3 o'clock.
he proceedings were commenced by singing the 21st Hymn
Saved from the damning power of sin,
The law's tremendous curse,
We'll now the sacred song begin
Where God began with us.
We'll sing the vast unmeasured grace
Which, from the days of old,
Did all his chosen sons embrace,
As sheep within the fold.
The basis of eternal love
Shall mercy's frame sustain;
Earth, hell, or sin, the same to move
Shall all conspire in vain.
Sing, O ye sinners bought with blood,
Hail the Great Three in One;
Tell how secure the cov'nant stood
Ere time its race begun.
Ne'er had ye felt the guilt of sin,
Nor sweets of pard'ning love,
Unless your worthless names had been
Enroll'd to life above.
O what a sweet exalted son
Shall rend the vaulted skies,
When, shouting, grace, the blood-wash'd throng
Shall see the Top Stone rise.
The Rev. George Wyard, of Deptford, offered prayer.
he REV. C. H. Spurgeon in opening the proceedings said, we have met
together beneath this roof already to set forth most of those truths
in which consists the peculiarity of this Church. Last evening we
endeavoured to show to the world, that we heartily recognised the
essential union of the Church of the Lord Jesus Christ. And now, this
afternoon and evening, it is our intention, through the lips of our
brethren, to set forth those things which are verily received among
us, and especially those great points which have been so often
attacked, but which are still upheld and maintained,truths which we
have proved in our experience to be full of grace and truth. My only
business upon this occasion is to introduce the brethren who shall
address you, and I shall do so as briefly as possible, making what I
shall say a preface to their remarks.
The controversy which has been carried
on between the Calvinist and the Arminian is exceedingly important,
but it does not so involve the vital point of personal godliness as
to make eternal life depend upon our holding either system of
theology. Between the Protestant and the Papist there is a
controversy of such a character, that he who is saved on the one side
by faith in Jesus, dare not allow that his opponent on the opposite
side can be saved while depending on his own works. There the
controversy is for life or death, because it hinges mainly upon the
doctrine of justification by faith, which Luther so properly called
the test doctrine, by which a Church either stands or falls. The
controversy again between the believer in Christ and the Socinian, is
one which affects a vital point. If the Socinian be right, we are
most frightfully in error; we are, in fact, idolaters, and how
dwelleth eternal life in us? and if we be right, our largest charity
will not permit us to imagine that a man can enter heaven who does
not believe the real divinity of the Lord Jesus Christ. There are
other controversies which thus cut at the very core, and touch the
very essence of the whole subject. But, I think we are free to admit,
that while John Wesley, for instance, in modern times zealously
defended Arminianism, and on the other hand, George Whitfield with
equal fervour fought for Calvinism, we should not be prepared either
of us, on either side of the question, to deny the vital godliness of
either the one or the other. We cannot shut our eyes to what we
believe to be the gross mistakes of our opponents, and should think
ourselves unworthy of the name of honest men, if we could admit that
they are right in all things and ourselves right too. An honest man
has an intellect which does not permit him to believe that "yes" and
"no" can both subsist at the same hour and both be true. I cannot
say, "It is," and my brother point blank say, "It is not," and yet
both of us be right on that point. We are willing to admit, in fact,
we dare not do otherwise, that opinion upon this controversy does not
determine the future of even the present state of any man; but still,
we think it to be so important, that in maintaining our views, we
advance with all courage and fervency if spirit, believing that we
are doing God's work and upholding most important truth. It may not
be misunderstood, we only use the term for shortness. That doctrine
which is called "Calvinism" did not spring from Calvin; we believe
that it sprang from the great founder of all truth. Perhaps Calvin
himself derived it mainly from the writings of Augustine. Augustine
obtained his views, without doubt, through the Spirit of God, from
the diligent study of the writings of Paul, and Paul received them of
the Holy Ghost, from Jesus Christ the great founder of the Christian
dispensation. We use the term then, not because we impute any
extraordinary importance to Calvin's having taught these doctrines.
We would be just as willing to call them by any other name, if we
could find one which would be better understood, and which on the
whole would be as consistent with fact. And then again, this
afternoon, we shall have very likely to speak of Arminians, and by
that, we would not for a moment insinuate that all who are in
membership with the Arminian body, hold those particular views. There
are Calvinists in connection with Calvinistic Churches, who are not
Calvinistic, bearing the name but discarding the system. There are,
on the other hand, not a few in the Methodist Churches, who, in most
points perfectly agree with us, and I believe that if the matter came
to be thoroughly sifted, it would be found that we are more agreed in
our private opinions than in our public confessions, and our
devotional religion is more uniform than our theology. For instance,
Mr. Wesley's hymn-book, which may be looked upon as being the
standard of his divinity, has in it upon some topics higher Calvinism
than many books used by ourselves. I have been exceedingly struck
with the very forcible expressions there used, some of which I might
have hesitated to employ myself. I shall ask your attention while I
quote verses from the hymns of Mr. Wesley, which we can all endorse
as fully and plainly in harmony with the doctrines of grace, far more
so than the preaching of some modern Calvinists. I do this because
our low-doctrine Baptists and Morisonians ought to be aware of the
vast difference between themselves and the Evangelical Arminians.
HYMN 131, verses 1, 2, 3.
"Lord, I despair myself to heal:
I see my sin, but cannot feel;
I cannot, till thy Spirit blow,
And bid the obedient waters flow.
'Tis thine a heart of flesh to give;
Thy gifts I only can receive:
Here, then, to thee I all resign;
To draw, redeem, and seal,is thine.
With simple faith on thee I call,
My Light, my Life, my Lord, my all:
I wait the moving of the pool;
I wait the word that speaks me whole."
HYMN 133, verse 4.
"Thy golden sceptre from above
Reach forth; lo! my whole heart I bow;
Say to my soul, Thou art my love;
My chosen midst ten thousand, thou."
This is very like election.
HYMN 136, verses 8, 9, 10.
"I cannot rest, till in thy blood
I full redemption have:
But thou, through whom I come to God,
Canst to the utmost save.
From sin, the guilt, the power, the pain,
Thou wilt redeem my soul:
Lord, I believe, and not in vain;
My faith shall make me whole.
I too, with thee, shall walk in white;
With all thy saints shall prove,
What is the length, and breadth, and height,
And depth of perfect love."
Brethren, is not this somewhat like final perseverance? and what is
meant by the next quotation, if people of God can perish at all?
HYMN 138, verses 6, 7.
"Who, who shall in thy presence stand,
And match Omnipotence?
Ungrasp the hold of thy right hand,
Or pluck the sinner thence?
Sworn to destroy, let earth assail;
Nearer to save thou art:
Stronger than all the powers of hell,
And greater than my heart."
The following is remarkably strong, especially in the expression
"force." I give it in full:
HYMN 158
"O my God, what must I do?
Thou alone the way canst show;
Thou canst save me in this hour;
I have neither will nor power:
God, if over all thou art,
Greater than my sinful heart,
All thy power on me be shown,
Take away the heart of stone.
Take away my darling sin,
Make me willing to be clean;
Make me willing to receive
All thy goodness waits to give.
Force me, Lord, with all to part;
Tear these idols from my heart;
Now thy love almighty show,
Make even me a creature new.
Jesus, mighty to renew,
Work in me to will and do;
Turn my nature's rapid tide,
Stem the torrent of my pride;
Stop the whirlwind of my will;
Speak, and bid the sun stand still;
Now thy love almighty show,
Make even me a creature new.
Arm of God, thy strength put on;
Bow the heavens, and come down;
All my unbelief o'erthrow;
Lay th' aspiring mountain low:
Conquer thy worst foe in me,
Get thyself the victory;
Save the vilest of the race;
Force me to be saved by grace."
HYMN 206, verses 1, 2.
"What am I, O thou glorious God!
And what my father's house to thee,
That thou such mercies hast bestow'd
On me, the vilest reptile, me!
I take the blessing from above,
And wonder at the boundless love.
Me in my blood the love pass'd by,
And stopp'd, my ruin to retrieve;
Wept o'er my soul thy pitying eye;
Thy bowels yearn'd, and sounded, "Live!"
Dying, I heard the welcome sound,
And pardon in thy mercy found."
Nor are these all, for such good things as these abound, and they
constrain me to say, that in attacking Arminianism we have no
hostility towards the men who bear the name rather than the nature of
that error, and we are opposed not to any body of men, but to the
notions which they have espoused.
And now, having made these remarks upon
terms used, we must observe that there is nothing upon which men need
to be more instructed than upon the question of what Calvinism really
is. The most infamous allegations have been brought against us, and
sometime, I must fear, by men who knew them to be utterly untrue;
and, to this day, there are many of our opponents, who, when they run
short of matter, invent and make for themselves a man of straw, call
that John Calvin, and then shoot all their arrows at it. We are not
come here to defend your man of strawshoot at it or burn it as you
will, and, if it suit your convenience, still oppose doctrines which
were never taught, and rail at fictions which, save in your own
brain, were never in existence. We come here to state what our views
really are, and we trust that any who do not agree with us will do us
the justice of not misrepresenting us. If they can disprove our
doctrines, let them state them fairly and then overthrow them, but
why should they first caricature our opinions and then afterwards
attempt to put them down? Among the gross falsehoods which have been
uttered against the Calvinists proper, is the wicked calumny that we
hold the damnation of little infants. A baser lie was never uttered.
There may have existed somewhere, in some corner of the earth, a
miscreant who would dare to say that there were infants in hell, but
I have never met with him, nor have I met with a man who ever saw
such a person. We say, with regard to infants, Scripture saith but
little, and, therefore, where Scripture is confessedly scant, it is
for no man to determine dogmatically. But I think I speak for the
entire body, or certainly with exceedingly few exceptions, and those
unknown to me, when I say, we hold that all infants are elect of God
and are therefore saved, and we look to this as being the means by
which Christ shall see of the travail of his soul to a great degree,
and we do sometimes hope that thus the multitude of the saved shall
be made to exceed the multitude of the lost. Whatever views our
friends may hold upon the point, they are not necessarily connected
with Calvinistic doctrine. I believe that the Lord Jesus, who said,
"Of such is the kingdom of heaven," doth daily and constantly receive
into his loving arms those tender ones who are only shown, and then
snatched away to heaven. Our hymns are no ill witness to our faith on
this point, and one of them runs thus:
"Millions of infant souls compose
The family above."
"Toplady, one of the keenest of
Calvinists, was of this number. "In my remarks," says he, "on Dr.
Nowell, I testified my firm belief that the souls of all departed
infants are with God in glory; that in the decree of predestination
to life, God hath included all whom he decreed to take away in
infancy, and that the decree of reprobation hath nothing to do with
them." Nay, he proceeds farther, and asks, with reason, how the
anti-Calvinistic system of conditional salvation and election, or
good works foreseen, will suit with the salvation of infants? It is
plain that Arminians and Pelagians must introduce a new principle of
election; and in so far as the salvation of infants is concerned,
become Calvinists. Is it not an argument in behalf of Calvinism, that
its principle is uniform throughout, and that no change is needed on
the ground on which man is saved, whether young or old? John Newton,
of London, the friend of Cowper, noted for his Calvinism, holds that
the children in heaven exceed its adult inhabitants in all their
multitudinous array. Gill, a very champion of Calvinism, held the
doctrine, that all dying in infancy are saved. An intelligent modern
writer, (Dr. Russell, of Dundee,) also a Calvinist, maintains the
same views; and when it is considered that nearly one-half of the
human race die in early years, it is easy to see what a vast
accession must be daily and hourly making to the blessed population
of heaven."
A more common charge, brought by more
decent people,for I must say that the last charge is never brought,
except by disreputable persons,a more common charge is, that we
hold clear fatalism. Now, there may be Calvinists who are fatalists,
but Calvinism and fatalism are two distinct things. Do not most
Christians hold the doctrine of the providence of God? Do not all
Christians, do not all believers in a God hold the doctrine of his
foreknowledge? All the difficulties which are laid against the
doctrine of predestination might, with equal force, be laid against
that of Divine foreknowledge. We believe that God hath predestinated
all things from the beginning, but there is a difference between the
predestination of an intelligent, all-wise, all-bounteous God, and
that blind fatalism which simple says, "It is because it is to be."
Between the predestination of Scripture and the fate of the Koran,
every sensible man must perceive a difference of the most essential
character. We do not deny that the thing is so ordained that it must
be, but why is it to be, but that the Father, God, whose name is
love, ordained it; not because of any necessity in circumstances that
such and such a thing should take place. Though the wheels of
providence revolve with rigid exactness, yet not without purpose and
wisdom. The wheels are full of eyes, and everything ordained is so
ordained that it shall conduce to the grandest of all ends, the glory
of God, and the next to that the good of his creatures. But we are
next met by some who tell us that we preach the wicked and horrible
doctrine of sovereign and unmerited reprobation. "Oh," say they, "you
teach that men are damned because God made them to be damned, and
that they go to hell, not because of sin, not because of unbelief,
but because of some dark decree with which God has stamped their
destiny." Brethren, this is an unfair charge again. Election does not
involve reprobation. There may be some who hold unconditional
reprobation. I stand not here as their defender, let them defend
themselves as best they can; I hold God's election, but I testify
just as clearly that if any man be lost he is lost for sin; and this
has been the uniform statement of Calvinistic ministers. I might
refer you to our standards, such as "The Westminster Assembly's
Catechism," and to all our Confession, for they all distinctly state
that man is lost for sin, and that there is no punishment put on any
man except that which he richly and righteously deserves. If any of
you have ever uttered that libel against us, do it not again, for we
are as guiltless of that as you are yourselves. I am speaking
personallyand I think in this I would command the suffrages of my
brethrenI do know that the appointment of God extendeth to all
things; but I stand not in this pulpit, nor in any other, to lay the
damnation of any man anywhere but upon himself. If he be lost,
damnation is all of man; but, if he be saved, still salvation is all
of God. To state this important point yet more clearly and
explicitly, I shall quote at large from an able Presbyterian
divine:
"The pious Methodist is taught that the
Calvinist represents God as creating men in order to destroy them. He
is taught that Calvinists hold that men are lost, not because they
sin, but because they are nonelected. Believing this to be a true
statement, it is not wonderful that the Methodist stops short, and
declares himself, if not an Arminian, at least an AntiPredestinarian.
But no statement can be more scandalously untrue. It is the uniform
doctrine of Calvinism, that God creates all for his own glory; that
he is infinitely righteous and benignant, and that where men perish
it is only for their sins.
In speaking of suffering, whether in
this world or in the world to come; whether it respects angels or
men, the Westminster standards (which may be considered as the most
authoritative modern statement of the system) invariably connect the
punishment with previous sin, and sin only. "As for those wicked and
ungodly men whom God as a righteous judge FOR FORMER SINS doth blind
and harden, from them he not only withholdeth his grace, whereby they
might have been enlightened in their understandings and wrought upon
in their hearts, but sometimes also with draweth the gifts which they
had, and exposeth them to such objects as their corruption makes
occasion of sin; and withal gives them over to their own lusts, the
temptations of the world, and the power of Satan, whereby it comes to
pass that they harden themselves even under those means which God
useth for the softening of others." The Larger Catechism, speaking of
the unsaved among angels and men, says, "God according to his
Sovereign power and the unsearchable counsel of his own will (whereby
he extendeth or withholdeth favour as he pleaseth) hath passed by and
fore-ordained the rest to dishonour and wrath, to be for their sin
inflicted, to the praise of the glory of his justice." Again, "the
end of God appointing this day (of the last judgment) is for the
manifestation of the glory of his mercy, in the eternal salvation of
the elect, and of his justice in the damnation of the reprobate who
are wicked and disobedient." This is no more than what the Methodist
and all other Evangelical bodies acknowledgethat where men perish
it is in consequence of their sin. If it be asked, why sin which
destroys, is permitted to enter the world, that is a question which
bears not only on the Calvinist, but equally on all other parties.
They are as much concerned and bound to answer it as he; nay, the
question in not confined to Christians. All who believe in the
existence of Godin his righteous character and perfect providence,
are equally under obligation to answer it. Whatever may be the reply
of others, that of the Calvinist may be regarded as given in the
statement of the Confession of Faith, which declares that God's
providence extendeth itself even to the first fall, and other sins of
angels and men, &c.; "yet so as the sinfulness thereof proceedeth
only from the creature, and not from God, who, being most holy and
righteous, neither is nor can be the author or approver of sin." It
is difficult to see what more could be said upon the subject; and if
such be the undoubted sentiments of Calvinists, then what
misrepresentation can be more gross than that which describes them as
holding that sinners perish irrespective of their sin, or that God is
the author of their sin? What is the declaration of Calvin? "Every
soul departs (at death) to that place which it has prepared for
itself while in this world."
It is hard to be charged with holding as
sacred truth what one abhors as horrid blasphemy, and yet this is the
treatment which has been perseveringly meted out to Calvinists in
spite of the most solemn and indignant disclaimers. Against nothing
have they more stoutly protested than the thought that the infinitely
holy, and righteous, and amiable Jehovah is the author of sin; and
yet how often do the supporters of rival systems charge them with
this as an article of faith?
A yet further charge against us is, that
we dare not preach the gospel to the unregenerate, that, in fact, our
theology is so narrow and cramped that we cannot preach to sinners.
Gentlemen, if you dare to say this, I would take you to any library
in the world where the old Puritan fathers are stored up, and I would
let you take down any one volume and tell me if you ever read more
telling exhortations and addresses to sinners in any of your own
books. Did not Bunyan plead with sinners, and whoever classed him
with any but the Calvinist? Did not Charnock, Goodwin, and Howe
agonise for souls, and what were they but Calvinist? Did not Jonathan
Edwards preach to sinners, and who more clear and explicit on these
doctrinal matters. The works of our innumerable divines teem with
passionate appeals to the unconverted. Oh, sirs, if I should begin
the list, time should fail me. It is an indisputable fact that we
have laboured more than they all for the winning of souls. Was George
Whitfield any the less seraphic? Did his eyes weep the fewer tears or
his bowels move with the less compassion because he believed in God's
electing love and preached the sovereignty of the Most High? It is an
unfounded calumny. Our souls are not stony; our bowels are not
withdrawn the compassion which we ought to feel for our fellowmen; we
can hold all our views firmly, and yet can weep as Christ did over a
Jerusalem which was certainly to be destroyed. Again, I must say, I
am not defending certain brethren who have exaggerated Calvinism. I
speak of Calvinism proper, not that which has run to seed, and
outgrown its beauty and verdure. I speak of it as I find it in
Calvin's Institutes, and especially in his Expositions. I have read
them carefully. I take not my views of Calvinism from common repute
but from his books. Nor do I, in this speaking, even vindicate
Calvinism as if I cared for the name, but I mean that glorious system
which teaches that salvation is of grace from first to last. And
again, then, I say it is an utterly unfounded charge that we dare not
preach to sinners.
And then further, that I may clear up
these points and leave the less rubbish for my brethren to wheel
away, we have sometimes heard it said, but those who say it ought to
go to school to read the first book of history, that we who hold
Calvinistic views are the enemies of revivals. Why, sirs, in the
history of the Church, with but few exceptions, you could not find a
revival at all that was not produced by the orthodox faith. What was
the great work which was done by Augustine, when the Church suddenly
woke up from the pestiferous and deadly sleep into which Pelagian
doctrine had cast it? What was the Reformation itself but the waking
up of men's minds to those old truths? However far modern Lutherans
may have turned aside from their ancient doctrines, and I must
confess some of them would not agree with what I now say, yet, at any
rate, Luther and Calvin had no dispute about Predestination. Their
views were identical, and Luther, "On the bondage of the will," is as
strong a book upon the free grace of God as Calvin himself could have
written. Hear that great thunderer while he cries in that book, "Let
the Christian reader know then, that God foresees nothing in a
contingent manner; but that he foresees, proposes, and acts, from his
eternal and unchangeable will. This is the thunder stroke which
breaks and overturns Free Will." Need I mention to you better names
than Huss, Jerome of Prague, Farrel, John Knox, Wickliffe, Wishart,
and Bradford? Need I do more than say that these held the same views,
and that in their day anything like an Arminian revival was utterly
unheard of and undreamed of. And then, to come to more modern times,
there is the great exception, that wondrous revival under Mr. Wesley,
in which the Wesleyan Methodists had so large a share; but permit me
to say, that the strength of the doctrine of Wesleyan Methodism lay
in its Calvinism. The great body of the Methodists disclaimed
Palagianism, in whole and in part. They contended for man's entire
depravity, the necessity of the direct agency of the Holy Spirit, and
that the first step in the change proceeds not from the sinner, but
from God. They denied at the time that they were Pelagians. Does not
the Methodist hold as firmly as ever we do, that man is saved by the
operation of the holy Ghost, and the Holy Ghost alone? And are not
many of Mr. Wesley's sermons full of that great truth, that the Holy
Ghost is necessary to regeneration? Whatever mistakes he may have
made, he continually preached the absolute necessity of the new birth
by the Holy Ghost, and there are some other points of exceedingly
close agreement; for instance, even that of human inability. It
matters not how some may abuse us, when we say man could not of
himself repent or believe; yet, the old Arminian standards said the
same. True, they affirm that God has given grace to every man, but
they do not dispute the fact, that apart from that grace there was no
ability in man to do that which was good in his own salvation. And
then, let me say, if you turn to the continent of America, how gross
the falsehood, that Calvinistic doctrine is unfavourable to revivals.
Look at that wondrous shaking under Jonathan Edwards, and others
which we might quote. Or turn to Scotlandwhat shall we say of
M'Cheyne? What shall we say of those renowned Calvinists, Dr.
Chalmers, Dr. Wardlow, and before them Livingstone, Haldane, Erskine,
and the like? What shall we say of the men of their school, but that,
while they held and preached unflinchingly the great truths which we
would propound to-day, yet God owned their word, and multitudes were
saved. And if it were not perhaps too much like boasting of one's own
work under God, I might say, personally I have never found the
preaching of these doctrines lull this Church to sleep, but ever
while they have loved to maintain these truths, they have agonised
for the souls of men, and the 1600 or more of whom I have myself
baptized, upon profession of their faith, are living testimonies that
these old truths in modern times have not lost their power to promote
a revival of religion.
I have thus cleared away these
allegations at the outset; I shall now need a few minutes more to
say, with regard to the Calvinistic system, that there are some
things to be said in its favour, to which of course I attach but
little comparative importance, but they ought not to be ignored. It
is a fact that the system of doctrines called the Calvinistic, is so
exceedingly simple and so readily learned, that as a system of
Divinity it is more easily taught and more easily grasped by
unlettered minds than any other. The poor have the Gospel preached to
them in a style which assists their memories and commends itself to
their judgments. It is a system which was practically acknowledged an
high philosophic grounds by such men as Bacon, Leibnitz, and Newton,
and yet it can charm the soul of a child and expand the intellect of
a peasant. And then it has another virtue. I take it that the last is
no mean one, but it has anotherthat when it is preached there is a
something in it which excites thought. A man may hear sermons upon
the other theory which shall glance over him as the swallow's wing
gently sweeps the brook, but these old doctrines either make a man so
angry that he goes home and cannot sleep for very hatred, or else
they bring him down into lowliness of thought, feeling the immensity
of the things which he has heard. Either way it excites and stirs him
up not temporarily, but in a most lasting manner. These doctrines
haunt him, he kicks against the pricks, and full often the word
forces a way into his soul. And I think this is no small thing for
any doctrine to do, in an age given to slumber, and with human hearts
so indifferent to the truth of God. I know that many men have gained
more good by being made angry under a sermon than by being pleased by
it, for being angry they have turned the truth over and over again,
and at last the truth has burned its way right into their hearts.
They have played with edge-tools, but they have cut themselves at
last.
It has this singular virtue alsoit is
so coherent in all its parts. You cannot vanquish a Calvinist. You
may think you can, but you cannot. The stones of the great doctrines
so fit into each other, that the more pressure there is applied to
remove them the more strenuously do they adhere. And you may mark,
that you cannot receive one of these doctrines without believing all.
Hold for instance that man is utterly depraved, and you draw the
inference then that certainly if God has such a creature to deal with
salvation must come from God alone, and if from him, the offended
one, to an offending creature, then he has a right to give or
withhold his mercy as he wills; you are this forced upon election,
and when you have gotten that you have all: the others must follow.
Some by putting the strain upon their judgments may manage to hold
two or three points and not the rest, but sound logic I take it
requires a man to hold the whole or reject the whole; the doctrines
stand like soldiers in a square, presenting on every side a line of
defence which it is hazardous to attack, but easy to maintain. And
mark you, in these times when error is so rife and neology strives to
be so rampant, it is no little thing to put into the hands of a young
man a weapon which can slay his foe, which he can easily learn to
handle, which he may grasp tenaciously, wield readily, and carry
without fatigue; a weapon, I may add, which no rust can corrode and
no blows can break, trenchant, and well annealed, a true Jerusalem
blade of a temper fit for deeds of renown. The coherency of the
parts, though it be of course but a trifle in comparison with other
things, is not unimportant. And then, I add,but this is the point
my brethren will take upit has this excellency, that it is
scriptural, and that it is consistent with the experience of
believers. Men generally grow more Calvinistic as they advance in
years. Is not that a sign that the doctrine is right. As they are
growing riper for heaven, as they are getting nearer to the rest that
remaineth for the people of God, the soul longs to feed on the finest
of the wheat, and abhors chaff and husks. And then, I addand, in so
doing, I would refute a calumny that has sometimes been urged,this
glorious truth has this excellency, that it produces the holiest of
men. We can look back through all our annals, and say, to those who
oppose us, you can mention no names of men more holy, more devoted,
more loving, more generous than those which we can mention. The
saints of our calendar, though uncanonized by Rome, rank first in the
book of life. The names of Puritan needs only to be heard to
constrain our reverence. Holiness had reached a height among them
which is rare indeed, and well it might for they loved and lived the
truth. And if you say that our doctrine is inimical to human liberty,
we point you to Oliver Cromwell and to his brave Ironsides,
Calvinists to a man. If you say, it leads to inaction, we point you
to the Pilgrim Fathers and the wildernesses they subdued. We can put
our finger upon every spot of land, the wide world o'er, and say,
"Here was something done by a man who believed in God's decrees; and,
inasmuch as he did this, it is proof it did not make him inactive, it
did not lull him to sloth."
The better way, however of proving this
point is for each of us who hold these truths, to be more prayerful,
more watchful, more holy, more active than we have ever been before,
and by so doing, we shall put to silence the gainsaying of foolish
men. A living argument, is an argument which tells upon every man; we
cannot deny what we see and feel. Be it ours, if aspersed and
calumniated, to disprove it by a blameless life, and it shall yet
come to pass, that our Church and its sentiments too shall come forth
"Fair as the moon, clear as the sun, and terrible as an army with
banners."
ELECTION
BY THE
Rev. JOHN BLOOMFIELD,
OF MEARD'S COURT, SOHO.
My dear Christian friends, those who
best know my cast of mind and ministry will readily believe me when I
say I would rather have spoken on the majesty and mystery of the
person of Christ, or I would rather have spoken on the perfection and
intrinsic worth of the mediation of Christ, or on the great
attraction of Christ as a gracious and omnipotent Saviour, than on
the subject that has been assigned to me. The subject that has been
given me is that of the doctrine of eternal and personal election; I
have to prove that the doctrine of election is a scriptural truth;
and, at the commencement of my few remarks on this profound subject,
allow me to say that I hold and firmly believe the Bible to be
revelation from God, that the revelations of God's mind are
essentially and infallibly true, that its ancient historical records
are of the greatest value, that its prophecies are to be studied and
to be venerated, that the doctrines of the Bible are in harmony with
the majesty, wisdom, holiness and goodness of their Author. Now it
should not be a point with us whether a doctrine is like or disliked,
whether it is believed or disbelieved, but whether it is a doctrine
according to godliness, whether it is the doctrine of the Word of
God. Truth has never been popular in this world: Jesus Christ when on
earth was by no means popular. Truth never will be popular in this
world while men are influenced by sin, and enmity against God.
Perhaps no doctrine has met with such bitter opposition as the
doctrine on which I have to speak. It has been fearfully
misunderstood for a want of prayerful and independent study of the
Holy Scriptures, or perhaps from the miserable misrepresentations
that have been given of it by some public men. It is a truth which
has been bitterly opposed; we may oppose a doctrine which we cannot
with all our puny efforts depose. We may dispute in our blindness and
enmity a doctrine which we cannot refute. We believe firmly that the
doctrine of election to salvation in Jesus Christ is a doctrine of
the Scriptures. We believe in sovereign love, but not in sovereign
hatred. We believe in salvation by the grace of God without works,
but not in damnation without sin. We believe firmly in election to
salvation by faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, but we discard from our
creed the miserable, wretched doctrine of reprobation without sin. Is
the doctrine of election a Scriptural doctrine? Can we prove it from
the word of God? It is one thing to believe it to be a doctrine of
Divine revelation, and it is another thing to have the sanctifying
grace and power of it in our hearts. The election we read of in the
Scriptures is inseparably connected with holiness, and we believe in
no election to salvation without faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. He
who has appointed salvation as an end has appointed the methods by
which that end shall be accomplished. Perhaps no man possessed of his
reasoning powers questions the truth that God has predestinated
harvest as long as this world shall continue. But without sowing of
seed, without the agricultural labour that is given to the land, we
should have no harvest, because he who predestinated harvest
predestinated the sowing of the seed as much. And God has appointed
us not unto wrath, but to obtain salvation through Jesus Christ. I
shall endeavour now to prove, from the quotation of a few Scriptures,
that the doctrine of eternal and personal election is a Scriptural
and Divine truth. Jesus Christ himself was said to be "chosen of God
and precious." He is God's elect, for Jehovah himself says, "Behold
my servant, mine elect in whom my soul delighteth." Angels that
continue in their unfallen dignity and felicity are termed elect
angels. Elect angels are employed as ministering spirits to those
that shall be heirs of salvation. Elect angels will be employed in
the gathering of God's elect into the heavenly world. The Jewish
nation was a chosen nation, and as such they were privileged with the
oracles of God, and stood as a representative people. They were
chosen not because of their personal worth, they were chosen not
because of their goodness, but they were chosen to be a separated
people, a people that should be God's peculiar treasure, and should
be holiness unto the Lord; of them it was said, "For thou art a holy
people unto the Lord thy Godthe Lord hath chosen thee to be a
special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face
of the earth." Jesus Christ himself, in the 24th chapter of Matthew,
speaks of certain days being shortened because of God's elect. The
Psalmist craved to be remembered with the favour that God was pleased
to bear towards his people, that he might see the good of his chosen.
And Jesus Christ himself said to his disciples, "Ye have not chose
me, but I have chosen you." And the Apostle Paul very often in his
writings has brought out this great and profound doctrine. He says,
"There is a remnant according to the election of grace." He speaks to
the Ephesian Church, and says, "Ye are chosen in Christ before the
foundation of the world that ye may be holy, and that ye may stand
before God without blame in love." God hath in the exercise of his
sovereignty chosen a people in Christ to salvation before time
beganit was before the foundation of the world, here is its
antiquityit is in Christ according to the riches of God's grace,
and it is to holiness and salvation. He, in his addresses to the
Church at Thessalonica, said he could but thank God "that they were
chosen to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and the
belief of the truth." Peter speaks of the people of God as a chosen
generation and a royal priesthood. He wrote to the elect according to
the foreknowledge of God the Father. More Scriptures might be given
upon this subject, but I think they would be unnecessary. If we would
only give our attention to the simple teachings of the Spirit of God
by the prophets, by the Psalmist, by Christ, and by the Apostles, we
could not have one moment's doubt as to the doctrine of Divine
election being a Scriptural truth.
My second point is to show that God has
chosen his people to the highest possible relation to himself, and to
the enjoyment of the most precious blessings in Christ. All spiritual
relations stand in Christ; all spiritual relations originated in
God's grace; and all spiritual relations are standing manifestations
of the sovereignty of God's favour and of the immutability of God's
love. If we are the sons of God, what has constituted us the sons of
God? We are sons of God by God's sovereign love; it is by an act of
adoption, it is by an act of Jehovah's will, that we are constituted
his sons and his daughters. Adoption is relation established to which
we have no natural right; adoption is one thing, and the spirit of
adoption is another. Now Christ is God's first-born, and all the
family are chose in him; Christ is the glorious Head of the Church,
and all the family of God are chosen members in him; Christ is the
everlasting Priest of his Church, and he represents all the family,
just as the Jewish priest represented by his breast-plate and in the
fulfilment of his office the whole of the Jewish nation. All relation
to God then stands in Christ, originated in the sovereignty of
Jehovah's will, and is expressive of the infinite love of Jehovah's
heart. We are chose to salvationthat is the end; the means by which
that end is accomplished is by the "sanctification of the Spirit, and
the belief of the truth." We are chose to usefulness; every Christian
should seek to be useful; every Christian in his right mind is a
witness for God; every Christian, as he is influenced by Christian
principles, bears testimony to the dignity of the relation that God
has established, and bears testimony to the holiness of the
principles by which his heart is influenced; every Christian should
be a living gospel, his life should bear testimony to the holiness of
that Christianity that he studies and is influenced by. We are chosen
to eternal life, but it is eternal life through Christ. Without faith
there is no evidence of interest in Christ, without faith there is no
enjoyment of salvation by Christ. Without faith, a man has no
evidence of interest in the Lamb's Book of Life; but he who believes
in Christ, however weak and trembling his faith has evidence in his
own heart that his name is written in the Lamb's Book of Life; and
his conduct corresponding with the holiness of the gospel, he carries
in his life a witness to his interest in all the purposes of heaven,
and in all the redemptive excellency of the Lord Jesus Christ. The
great evidence of interest in election is holiness. A man to talk of
believing in election, and going to heaven, because he is one of
God's elect, and yet living in sin, and in enmity to God, this can
never, never be. We are chosen unto salvation, it is said, "through
sanctification of the Spirit and the belief of the truth;" and,
without this sanctification of the Spirit and the belief of the
truth, there is no holiness; and, "without holiness, no man can see
the Lord." Without holiness, no man would be capable of serving God
in heaven; without holiness, no man would be capable of beholding the
glories of Jesus Christ there; without holiness, no man can serve God
with power and success here; without holiness, no man can have
fellowship with God, and so have fellowship with us, for truly our
fellowship is with the Father and with his son Jesus Christ. It is
only by practical life of consistency with faith in Christ Jesus,
that we have evidence of our interest in election. We are chosen, not
because we are holy, but that we might be holy; we are chosen, not
because we are good, but that by the principles of the everlasting
Gospel, we might become so; we are chosen, not because we are saved,
but that we may be saved through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. I
hold, dear friends, that the great doctrine of election should be
preached. It should be preached, because it is part of a grand system
of truth. Truth is not one doctrine, but it is a grand system, and
you cannot leave out one part without impairing its beauty, nor leave
out one part of this system without weakening its strength. The
beauty of truth lies in its perfection, and in that harmony of its
connection; the strength of truth lies in the unity of its parts, and
it is like gold dustit is all precious. If Election be not a truth
inspired by the Spirit of the living Godif it be not a truth
proclaimed by the prophets that were inspiredif it be not a truth
published by the Apostlesif it be not a truth found in the
teachings of the word of God, let us never say one word about it; but
if it was truth in the days of the Apostles, then it is no less a
truth now. What the Apostles preached, I hold, we ought to preach in
the spirit of love, in the spirit of faith, in the spirit of
meekness, entirely depending on the power of the Holy Spirit to give
us success in the conversion of immortal souls. One moment longer,
and I have done. There is nothing in the doctrine of election that is
discouraging to a penitent, seeking sinner. There is everything in
the Gospel to welcome the returning prodigal to his Father's house;
there is everything to meet the necessities of an awakened
conscience; there is everything in the Gospel to satisfy the longing
of a penitent soul. I know some may say, "I fear, Sir, I shall not be
saved because I am not one of God's elect." Art thou a sinner? art
thou a penitent sinner? art thou a seeking sinner? If thou art a
seeking, penitent sinner, you cannot imagine how welcome you are to
the provisions of infinite love. Every truth in the Gospel is open to
you; every promise in the Gospel is open to you; every invitation in
Scripture speaks to you. If thou art a sinner seeking mercy, let this
cheer thy heartthat God delighteth in mercy. If thou art seeking
salvation, Jesus is a willing and an able Saviour, and he has said,
"All that the Father giveth to me shall come to me, and him that
cometh I will in no wise cast out." There is nothing, dear friends,
in the doctrine of election as it stands in the Scriptures that
should discourage any penitent in seeking after mercy through Jesus
Christ. I know, in the miserable misrepresentation of this great and
glorious truth, men might well be discouraged from seeking mercy
through the Saviour. But see it in its Scriptural connection; see it
in the simplicity of it as it is put before us by the great Apostles;
see it in the teachings of the Saviour himself, and there is nothing
in it but that which welcomes a penitent sinner. It is a great
encouragement to a seeking soul. Does the farmer who sows his seed
sow that seed with less or more encouragement because he knows that
God has ordained that harvest shall be? He sows his seed with a heart
brimfull with hope, because God has promised that a harvest shall be
as long as the world continues. Only let the means be used according
to the Holy Scriptures; only let the poor awakened, penitent sinner
renounce everything but Christ and him crucified, mercy will roll
into his troubled heart and fill his spirit with peace, and he shall
come off more than conqueror, shouting, Victory through the blood of
the LambVictory, victory through Jesus Christ.
HUMAN DEPRAVITY
BY THE
Rev. EVAN PROBERT,
OF BRISTOL.
My Christian friends, you are quite
aware that the subject which is to engage our further attention this
afternoon, is HUMAN DEPRAVITYa subject about which there are
different opinions, which I shall not attempt to examine at the
present time, but I shall confine myself to the teachings of God's
word, which is the only infallible rule of faith and practice, and
from which we learn what man was when he came from the hands of his
Maker, and what he is now as a fallen creature. It is explicitly
declared by the sacred writers, that God made man upright, and
therefore his condition was one of perfect innocence and high moral
excellence. There was no tendency to evil in any part of his nature,
nothing that deviated in the least from the rule of moral rectitude.
Whatever his duty was, it was to him his invariable and delightful
employment. But, alas! man in honour did not long continue. Through
the insinuating wiles of the devil, our first parents were induced to
violate the positive command of their Maker, the observance of which
was the condition of their happiness, and, as punishment for their
transgression, they were driven out of Paradise, and became liable to
be cut off by the sentence of death, and consigned to everlasting
misery; and, in consequence of our connection with Adam, as our
federal head and representative, we became subject to the dreadful
consequences of his fall. This is evident from the testimony of the
Apostle Paul, in the fifth Chapter of his Epistle to the Romans.
There we read, "By one man sin entered into the world, and death by
sin, so that death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned."
And, again, "By the offence of one, judgment came upon all men to
condemnation, and by the disobedience of one, many were made
sinners." It is evident from these passages that God viewed Adam in
the covenant of works as the head and representative of his natural
posterity, and consequently, when he fell we fell in him, and became
subject to the tremendous consequences of his fall. Here it may be
asked, what are the consequences of his fall? what were they to him,
and what are they to us? To answer this question, we must ascertain
what the Apostle means when he uses the words death, judgment, and
condemnation. I think that he uses these words in opposition to the
grace of God, to justification of life, and to the reign of the
redeemed in life by Jesus Christ. These are the benefits which result
from the grace of God through Christ, and which stand opposed to the
evils which sin has introduced into our world; and, as it cannot be
supposed that these benefits relate to temporal life, or solely to
the resurrection of the body, it cannot be that the evils involved in
the words, death, judgment, and condemnation, relate simply to
temporal death, but they must be considered as including temporal,
legal, and spiritual death.
From the very hour that Adam
transgressed, he became mortal,the sentence of death was pronounced
upon him, and the seeds of depravity were sown in his system; thus
the fair and beautiful and glorious creature began to fade, wither,
and die, and all his posterity became mortal in him, and have from
that day to this come into the world dying. Whatever the case of man
might have been if he had not sinned we cannot say. This however we
know, that he would not have died; for death is the result of the
federal failure of the father of our race. "Dust thou are," God said
to him, "and unto dust shalt thou return." "By one man sin entered
into the world, and death by sin." "In Adam all died." So that it may
be said to every one of Adam's sons and daughters, "Dust thou art,
and unto dust shalt thou return."
But Adam by his transgression not only
brought temporal death upon himself and his posterity, he also
brought legal death. Having violated the law that was given him to
observe, he became under the curse of that law, which involved not
only temporal death and expulsion from Paradise, but an exposure to
suffer the just demerits of his transgression; and, in consequence of
our connection with him as our federal head, we are under the curse
of the same law"By one man's disobedience judgment came upon all
men to condemnation;" and further, "By the offence of one many were
made sinners." The very moment our progenitor transgressed, all his
descendants became subject to the curse. The holy nature of God
abhorred the apostate race; the curse of his holy and righteous law
has ever rested upon that race; judgment has been given and recorded
against us as a fallen world, in the court of Heaven, and unless it
is reversed it must fall upon us with all its tremendous
consequences.
We are also, in consequence of Adam's
transgression, become the subjects of spiritual death, which consists
not merely in the deprivation of the principle of life; but in having
become depraved creatures, all the faculties of our souls and members
of our bodies are depraved, so that it may be said of us, as the
prophet says of the Jewish nation, "The head is sick, the whole heart
is faint; from the sole of the foot unto the head there is no
soundness." What! no soundness in any part? nothing good in any part?
nothing spiritually good? nothing if cherished and fostered that will
not lead to God, to Heaven, and to happiness? Nothing whatever. Let
no one mistake me. I do not mean to say for a single moment, that sin
has destroyed any of the faculties of man's soul, for they are all
there. They all exist as they did when they were produced; but I mean
to say, that sin has deprived man of the principle of spiritual life,
and made him a depraved and debased creature; and we believe that we
can prove this from the word of God, as well as from observation.
First,From the conduct of little
children. Children begin to sin very early in life. If there were any
good in us, it would show itself in infancy, before good habits
became corrupted, and evil principles were produced by our connection
with the world. But do little children prefer good? Are they inclined
to the good and the excellent? Do you see from the earliest period of
their existence that they are desirous of good? On the contrary, I
say, as soon as they begin to act, they prove by their action, that
in them there is a depraved nature, from which they act. "Madness,"
says a wise man, "is bound up in the heart of a child," they go
astray from the womb telling lies. But it may be said, in the way of
objection, that this may arise from the unfavourable circumstance in
which some children are placed. No doubt, unfavourable circumstances
have a bad influence upon the minds of children; but it is not so
with the whole race. Point out to me, one child who is disposed from
infancy to seek that which is good, that which is holy. And surely,
if the tendency of infants from their earliest history is to evil, it
is a proof that it must arise from the evil propensities within them,
which grow with their growth, and strengthen with their strength.
Secondly,We have further proof of
human depravity from the aversion of sinners to come to Christ. They
are invited to come, persuaded to come, and are assured that they
shall find pardon, acceptance, and salvation. But they cannot be
induced to come to him; and why will they not come? Is it because he
is not willing to receive them, or because there is anything in him
to prevent them? No, but it is because of the deep-rooted depravity
in their hearts. The heart is averse to all that is good, and
therefore rejects the Saviour and turns away from him. Hence he
complained when in our world, "How often would I have gathered you,
even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would
not." "Ye will not come to me, that ye might have life." What more
needed to be added? Man turns away in proud disdain from all the
blessings of the gospel, and the glories of heaven brought before
him, and rushes on with steady purpose to damnation. "Light is come
into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because
their deeds are evil." Oh, to how many in this land may it be said,
"They hate knowledge and did not choose the fear of the Lord; they
would none of his counsel, they despised all his reproof."
Thirdly,We have further evidence of
native depravity from the testimony of Scripture. In the first place,
let me refer you to the fifth chapter of the Book of Genesis, and the
third verse. There we read, that Adam, after he had lived one hundred
and thirty years, begat a son in his own likeness after his image.
Mind, the image in which Adam was created was the image of God, but
that image he had lost before he begat Seth; therefore, the image in
which Seth was born must have been the image of his progenitor, as a
fallen and depraved creature. Let me refer you, in the second place,
to the third chapter of the Gospel of John. "He that is born of the
flesh," said the Saviour to Nicodemus, "is flesh, and he that is born
of the Spirit is spirit." To be born of the flesh, according to the
wisest interpretation of that passage, is to be born of a depraved
nature; to be born of the Spirit is to be born of the Holy Spirit of
Godwhich birth, the Saviour told Nicodemus he must experience
before he could see the kingdom of God. And again, we have several
passages in proof of this point. In the seventh chapter of the
Epistle to the Romans, at the fifth verse of that chapter, the
Apostle says, "When we were in the flesh, the motions of sin by the
law which worked in us to bring forth fruit unto death." "When we
were in the flesh," means thiswhen we were in an unrenewed depraved
state. In the same chapter he says, at the 14th verse, "We know that
the law is spiritual, but I am carnal, sold under sin;" as if he had
said, "I am as a sinner, a depraved creature." In accordance with
this the Apostle says, at the 18th verse of the same chapter, "In
methat is, in my fleshthere dwelleth no good thing." No love to
God, no holy aspirations! No, none whatever. At the beginning of the
eighth chapter the same Epistle, we find the terms "flesh" and
"Spirit" placed in opposition to each other, "Who walk not after the
flesh,' says the Apostle, describing Christians, "but after the
Spirit." To be in the flesh is to be in a depraved state, to be in
the Spirit is to be a partaker of his grace; to walk after the flesh
is to walk after the dictates of corrupt principles and propensities,
to walk after the Spirit is to be governed by spiritual principles
and by the Holy Spirit of God; and the Apostle, in writing to the
Galatians, says to them, "Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil
the lusts of the flesh." These passages, I think, prove beyond all
contradiction, that man as a fallen creature, is a depraved creature,
destitute of any good. There are many other passages of Scripture
that confirm this doctrine, such as the following, "Who can bring a
clean thing out of a unclean." Not one. What is man that he should be
clean, or the son of man that he should be just. "Behold," says a
Psalmist, "I was shapen in iniquity, and in sin did my mother
conceive me." Read the account of man before the deluge, and there we
find that every imagination and the thought of his heart were only
evil, and that continually. The same account is given of him after
the flood. The deluge could not wipe away the stains of moral
pollution, could not destroy in man the deep-rooted depravity of his
heart. "The heart," says Jeremiah, "is deceitful above all things and
desperately wicked, who can know it." I think that what our blessed
Lord said to the Jews of old, is applicable to every unconverted man
under heaven"But I know you that ye have not the love of God in
you." Some of you may be more humane that others, more benevolent
than other, more compassionate than other, as men, and as women, but
one has as much of the love of God in him as others. "The carnal mind
is enmity against God," against the being of God, against the
government of God, against the gospel of God, against the purposes of
God. The enmity of the human heart is unconquerable by any human
agency whatever. It is mortal enmity, it strikes at the being of God,
and, therefore, as President Edwards, of America, justly observes,
"that when it found God in our nature, in our world, it put him to
death on the accursed tree." Such, my brethren, is the enmity of the
heart of man, such is its deeprooted depravity, that in him there is
no good thing. We can never speak too bad of what sin has done for
us, and we can never speak too much, or too well, of what God has
done for us, in the person of his Son, and in us, by the agency of
his Holy Spirit.
FourthlyThe doctrine of human
depravity may be proved from those passages which assert the
universal necessity of redemption by Jesus Christ. "Thou shalt call
his name Jesus," said the angel, "because he shall save his people
from their sins," "In him we have redemption through his blood," says
St. Paul, "even the forgiveness of sin according to the riches of his
grace." Now, the work of redemption pre-supposes the sinful state of
man, and implies a deliverance from that state and from the
punishment to which man is exposed. Hence it is said of Christ, that
he came into the world to save sinners, to seek and to save that
which was lost, and that he diedthe just for the unjustthat he
might bring us to God. Now, if redemption by Christ is necessary, it
is evident that man is a sinner; and, if man is a sinner, it is
evident that man has a depraved nature. You cannot make anything else
of it. Say what you like about man and about his excellencies, you
must come to this conclusion, that he is a condemned and a depraved
creature, or else he would not need redemption through the blood of
our Lord Jesus Christ.
Fifthly,The passages that assert the
universal necessity of the new birth prove this very truth"Except a
man be born of water," said the Saviour, "and of the Spirit, he
cannot see the kingdom of God. Marvel not that I said unto you, ye
must be born again." But if a man has some good in him, and if that
good could be cherished, and be increased, and worked up so as to
make men fit for heaven, what need of the new birth? what need of the
Spirit of all grace to renew him in the spirit of his mind? Whenever,
my brethren, you pray to God for the Spirit to change the human
heart, whether you believe the doctrine or not, you imply it in your
petition before the mercy-seat. They are represented by the sacred
writers as having been called from darkness into light, as having an
unction from the Holy One whereby they know all things, and those of
them who have been called readily acknowledge that they were once
foolish, once deceived and deceiving, once depraved very depraved;
and not only so, but the very best of Christians in the world confess
with humility the depravity of their hearts, and I believe that the
man who knows himself best is the man who is most ready to confess
this and to humble himself before God"Oh wretched man that I am,
who shall deliver me from the body of this death?" And while
Christians feel this, their language is, "Create within me a clean
heart, oh God! and renew a right spirit within me; purge me with
hysop and I shall be clean, wash me and I shall be whiter than snow."
Apply the blood of sprinkling to my guilty conscience, and let the
Spirit of all grace work in my polluted and depraved heart, and form
me to the image of the Lord Jesus Christ, and meeten my immortal
spirit for the inheritance of the saints in light, and of angels in
glory. My dear friends, I need not say more. I should not think there
is an individual here this afternoon who is not disposed to agree
with me, when I say that man is fallen creature, is a depraved
creature, is a condemned creature: he is under the curse of God's
righteous law, and at the same time the subject of the reigning power
of depravity, the subject of the effects of sin throughout his whole
nature; and that, as a sinner, let it be recorded in high heaven
there is no good in man's nature until God puts it there, and you
will never be brought, by beloved hearers, into a right state of mind
before God, until you are brought to feel that you have nothing, and
that you must have all in the Lord Jesus Christ. "Oh! Israel, thou
hast destroyed thyself!" But here are blessed tidings, "But in me is
their help found." Does not this subject, my hearers, teach us, in
the first place, the amazing long suffering of God towards our race.
God might, as soon as man sinned, without the least imputation of
injustice to his character, have cut him down, because the fall was
the result of his criminal choice, and attended by the most
aggravating circumstances; but God has borne with us, and is bearing
still, which shows that he has no pleasure in the death of the
sinner, but rather that he should turn from his ways and live. "Turn
ye, turn ye, for why will ye die, oh! house of Israel?" And does not
the subject teach us also the helplessness of man as a sinner? He is
unable to atone for his sins or to renew his heart. Many attempts
have been made to atone for human transgression, and to cleans and
purify the human heart, but they have all failed, not one has
succeeded. No sacrifice, short of an infinite one, could satisfy
Divine justice and magnify the broken law. No power, short of the
omnipotent energy of the Eternal Spirit, can renew the human heart.
But, while man is a helpless creature he is not a hopeless creature.
We do not say to him there is no hope. Oh, no! I rejoice in that
thought at this very moment. God has remembered us in our lowest
state, he has laid help upon one that is mighty, one who, by his
passive and active obedience, has magnified the law and made it
honourable, satisfied the claims of Divine justice, so that God can
be just, and the justifier of him that believeth in the Lord Jesus
Christ; and while he made atonement for our transgressions, he has
procured for us the Spirit of all grace to renew our nature, to
transform us into the likeness of himself, and to prepare us in the
use of means for the inheritance of the saints in light. Those of us
who are made partakers of the Holy Ghost, and, I trust, most of us
arewould to God that I could believe that we all arelet us pray
for a larger measure of the Spirit, upon ourselves, individually, and
upon the world around us. Surely, my hearers, my dear brother who has
to occupy this platform, and who has to unfurl to you the banner of
the cross, will need a large measure of the Holy Spirit. May He come
upon his head, and upon his heart; and may he never ascend this
platform but in His strength, and under His guidance, and in His
light; may he never preach a sermon without its being blessed to the
conversion of souls, and the building up of the Church; and may you,
as a Christian Church, continue earnest in prayer for the Spirit to
come, and it is the Spirit will reconcile us to each other, the
Spirit will remove differences between Arminians and Calvinists, the
Spirit will bring us to see, by-and-by, eye to eye, and this world
will be filled with the glory of God. May the Lord command his
blessing upon these remarks, for his name's sake. Amen.
The Meeting then adjourned till
half-past six. After the friends had assembled
The REV. C. H. SPURGEON said, I wish to
make one or two observations before I introduce to you the speakers
of this evening. Controversy is never a very happy element for the
child of God: he would far rather be in communion than engaged in
defence of the faith or in attack upon error. But the soldier of
Christ knows no choice in his Master's commands. He may feel it to be
better for him to lie upon the bed of rest than to stand covered with
the sweat and dust of battle; but as a soldier he has learned to
obey, and the rule of his obedience is not his personal comfort but
his Lord's absolute command. The servant of God must endeavour to
maintain all the truth which his Master has revealed to him, because,
as a Christian soldier, this is part of his duty. But while he does
so, he accords to others the liberty which he enjoys himself. In his
own house of prayer he must and will maintain that which he believes
to be true. He does not feel himself at all out of temper or angry
when he hears that in other places there are some holding different
views of what the truth is, who as honestly, and perhaps as forcibly,
endeavour to maintain their views. To our own Master we stand or
fall; we have no absolute judge of right or wrong incarnate in the
flesh on earth to-day. Nor is even the human judgment itself an
infallible evidence of our being, for since the fall, no powers of
mortals are free from imperfection. Our judgment is not necessarily a
fully enlightened one, and we ourselves therefore let another man's
judgment also be his guide unto God; but we must not forget that
every man is responsible to the Most High for the use of that
judgment, for the use of that mental power which God has given him,
by which he is to weigh and balance the arguments of either side. I
have found commonly that, with regard to the doctrine of grace which
we preach, there are a great many objections raised. One of the
simplest trades in the world is the raising of objections. You never
need, if you wish to set up in that line of business, to look abroad
for capital or resources; however poor and penniless a man may be,
even in wits, he can easily manufacture difficulties. It is said
"that a fool may raise objections which a thousand wise men could not
answer." I would not hesitate to say that I could bring objections to
your existence to-night, which you could not disprove. I could
sophisticate and mystify until I brought out the conclusion that you
were blind, and deaf, and dumb, and I am not sure that by any process
of logic you would be able to prove that you were not so. It might be
clear enough to you that you could both speak, and see, and hear. The
only evidence, however, I suppose that you could give, would be by
speaking, and seeing, and hearing, which might be conclusive enough;
but if it were left to be a mere matter of word-fighting for
schoolmen, I question whether the caviller might not cavil against
you to the judgment-day in order to dispute you out of the evidence
of your very senses. The raising of difficulties is the easiest trade
in all the world, and, permit me to add, it is not one of the most
honourable. The raising of objections has been espoused, you know, by
that great and mighty master of falsehood in the olden times, and it
has been carried on full often by those whose doubts about the truth
sprung rather from their hearts than from their heads. Some
difficulties, however, ought to be met, and let me now remove one or
two of them. There are some who say, "Provided the doctrines of grace
be true, what is the use of our preaching?" Of course I can hardly
resist a smile while I put this splendid difficultyit is so huge a
one. If there are so many who are to be saved, then why preach? You
cannot diminish, you cannot increase the number, why preach the
Gospel? Now, I thought my friend Mr. Bloomfield anticipated this
difficulty well enough. There must be a harvest,why sow, why
plough? Simply because the harvest is ordained in the use of the
means. The reason why we preach at all is because God has ordained to
save some. If he had not, we could not see the good of preaching at
all. Why! we should come indeed on a fool's errand if we came here
without the Master's orders at our back. His elect shall be
savedevery one of them,and if not by my instrumentality or that
of any brother here present, if not by any instrumentality, then
would God sooner call them by his Holy Spirit, without the voice of
the minister, than that they should perish. But this is the very
reason why we preach, because we wish to have the honour of being the
means, in the hand of God, of calling these elect ones to himself.
The certainty of the result quickens us in our work, and surely it
would stay none but a fool in his labour. Because God ordains that
his word shall not return unto him void, therefore, we preach that
word, because, "as the rain cometh down and the snow from heaven, and
returneth not thither, but watereth the earth and maketh it to bring
forth and bud, even so doth the word of the Lord accomplish his
purpose;" therefore, we would have our doctrine to drop as the rain
and distil as the dew, and as the small rain upon the tender herb.
But, there are some again who say, "To what purpose after all, is
your inviting any to come, when the Spirit of God alone constrains
them to come; and why, especially, preach to those whom believe to be
so depraved that they cannot and will not come?" Ay, just so, this is
a serious difficulty to everything except faith. Do you see Ezekiel
yonder; he is about to preach a sermon. By his leave, we will stop
him. "Ezekiel, where are you about to preach?" "I am about," saith
he, "to preach to a strange congregationdead, dry bones, lying in a
mass in a valley." "But, Ezekiel, they have no power to live." "I
know that," saith he. "To what purpose, then, is your preaching to
them? If they have no power, and if the breath must come from the
four winds, and they have no life in themselves, to what purpose do
you preach?" "I am ordered to preach," saith he, "commanded;" and he
does so. He prophesies, and afterward mounting to a yet higher stage
of faith, he cries, "Come from the four winds, oh breath, and breathe
upon these slain, that they may live." And the wind comes, and the
effect of his ministry is seen in their life. So preach we to dead
sinners; so pray we for the living Spirit. So, by faith, do we expect
his Divine influence, and it comes,cometh not from man, nor of man,
nor by blood, nor by the will of the flesh, but from the sovereign
will of God. But not withstanding it comes instrumentally through the
faith of the preacher while he pleads with man, "as though God did
beseech them by us, we pray them in Christ's stead to be reconciled
to God." But if ten thousand other objections were raised, my simple
reply would be just this, "We can raise more objections against your
theory, than you can against ours." We do not believe that our scheme
is free from difficulties; it were uncandid if we were to say so. But
we believe that we have not the tithe of the difficulties to contend
with that they have on the opposite side of the question. It is not
hard to find in those texts which appear to be most against us, a
key, by which they are to be harmonized; and we believe it to be
utterly impossible, without wresting Scripture, to turn those texts
which teach our doctrine, to teach any other thing whatsoever. They
are plain, pointed, pertinent. If the Calvinistic scheme were the
whole sum and substance of all truth, why then surely, if it held
everything within some five or six doctrines, you might begin to
think that man were God, and that God's theology were less than
infinite in its sweep. What are we, that we should grasp the
infinite? We shall never measure the marches of eternity. Who shall
compass with a span the Eternal God, and who shall think out anew his
infinite thoughts? We pretend not that Calvinism is a plumb-line to
fathom the deeps; but we do say, that it is a ship which can sail
safely over its surface, and that every wave shall speed it onwards
towards its destined haven. To fathom and to comprehend is neither
your business nor mine, but to learn, and then, having learned, to
teach to others, is the business of each Christian man; and thus
would be do, God being our helper. One friend kindly suggests a
difficulty to me, which, having just spoken of, I shall sit down.
That amazing difficulty has to do with the next speaker's topic, and,
therefore, I touch it. It says in the Scriptures, that Paul would not
have us destroy him with our meat for whom Christ died. Therefore,
the inference isonly mark, we don to endorse the logicthe
inference is, that you may destroy some with your meat for whom
Christ died. That inference I utterly deny. But then, let me put it
thus. Do you know, that a man may be guilty of a sin which he cannot
commit. Does that startle you? Every man is guilty of putting God out
of existence, if he says in his heart, "No God." But he cannot put
God out of existence; and yet, the guilt is there, because he would
if he could. There be some who crucify the Son of God afresh. They
cannot,he is in heaven, he is beyond their reach. And yet, because
their deeds would do that, unless some power restrained, they are
guilty of doing what they can never do, because the end and aim of
their doings would be to destroy Christ, if he were here. Now, then,
it is quite consistent with the doctrine that no man can destroy any
for whom Christ died, still to insist upon it that a man may be
guilty of the blood of souls. He may do that which, unless God
prevented it,and that is no credit to him,unless God prevented
it, would destroy souls for whom Jesus Christ died. But, again I say,
I have not come here to-night to anticipate and to answer all
objections; I have only done that, that some troubled conscience
might find peace. This was not a meeting of discussion, but for the
explaining of our views, and the teaching them simply to the people.
I now shall call upon my beloved brother to take up the point of
particular redemption.
PARTICULAR REDEMPTION
BY THE
Rev. J. A. SPURGEON,
OF SOUTHAMPTON.
I think it is well that the death of
Christ and its consequent blessings should occupy one place in our
discussion here to-night; for not only is it the central truth in the
Calvinistic theory, but the death of Christ is the centre point of
all history and of all time. The devout of all ages have stood and
gazed with anxious glance into these deep mysteries, searching what,
or what manner of things the Holy Spirit did by them testify and
reveal; and we know that hereafter, in yon world of glory, the
redeemed shall sing of these things for ever, and shall find in the
Redeemer and in his work, fresh matter for love and for praise as
eternity shall roll on. We take our stand between the two, and I
think the language of our hearts to-night is akin to all ages of the
Church of Christ,"God forbid that we should glory save in the cross
of our Lord Jesus Christ."
Now the grand result of the death of our
Lordthough not the only resultthe grand result of that death, so
far as man is concerned, is the redemption which it ultimately
achieves; and, with regard to the extent of that redemption, we
believe the Scriptures are plain and speak most clearly, when they
tell of a final day of manifestation, when the redeemed from amongst
men shall take their stand before the Redeemer, to sing of him who,
as the good shepherd, hath laid down his life for his sheep, and has
purchased unto himself a peculiar peoplehis body, the Church. Now,
we believe that, in reaching that grand and final result there are
many steps that must be taken, and we think that, from these
preliminary steps, there are multitudes that gain rich handfuls of
blessings who shall not however reap the full harvest of glory. We
believe that the whole world is flooded with blessings, and that the
stream rolls broad and clear from the hill-foot of Calvary, and laves
the feet alike of the godly and of the ungodly, the thankful and the
thankless. But from the riven side of Christ there comes forth one
streamthe river of life, whose banks are trodden only by the feet
of the multitude of believers, who wash and are clean, who drink and
liver for evermore. We speak to-night of Christ's death in its
various relations, so as to touch upon and include sundry things
which cannot be properly classed under the title of particular
redemption; but we feel we are driven to this course, so as to be
able to do justice to ourselves and to our leading theme.
Now, we have three sets of truths before
us, and these three sets of truths we must deal with. (1.) We have,
first of all, a God holy and righteous, loving and gracious, a God
who has been most grievously wronged and injured, and a God who must
be honoured alike by the giving him all the glory of which he has
been robbed, and by the bearing of his just expression of holy
indignation at the wrong that has been done unto him. We have a God
jealous in the extreme, and yet, strange enough, declaring that he
passes by iniquity and forgiveth transgression and sin. We have a God
truthful, who has sworn "that the soul that sinneth it shall die,"
and who yet speaks to those souls, and says, "Turn ye, turn ye; for
why will ye die." A God whom we know must be just, and must execute
upon the ungodly that which they have justly merited, and who yet
strangely says, "Come and let us plead together, and though your sins
be as scarlet I will make them as wool, and though they be like
crimson I will make them white as snow." That is one set of
truthsstrange, and apparently contradictory. Then we have another.
(2.) We have a world lost, and yet swathed in an atmosphere of mercy.
We have a world dark with the darkness of death, and yet everywhere
we find it more or less under the influence of the beams of the Sun
of Righteousness, which came a light unto darkness, that did not and
could not comprehend it. And we have, moreover, a world rebellious,
and serving another master than the right one, and yet nevertheless
beneath the feet of him who has been made Head over all things for
his body's sake, which is the Church. (3.) And then, once more, we
have a Church peculiar in its unmerited privileges, chose from before
all time to inherit the kingdom given to it before the world begana
kingdom that can never be trodden upon save by the spotless and the
deathless; and yet the inheritors are by nature dead in trespasses
and in sinslost, ruinedwithout a God and without a hope in the
world. How are all those strange and apparently contradictory things
to be solved? One clue, we find, is in the cross of our Lord Jesus
Christ. The work involves its ultimate end, which is redemption, and
of that work we are about to speak here to-night.
We speak first of those blessings which
come from the death of Christ, and are for all men; the whole world
is under a mediatorial government, the whole spirit of which is a
government of long-suffering, graciousness, tenderness, and mercy,
such as could not have been exercised had Christ never died. A
government there might have been, but it must be, we think, a
government akin to that which is found in the place where those are
found who make their bed in hell. We find, moreover, that the direct
and indirect influences of the Cross of Christ have pervaded the
whole world, and none can tell how full oft its gentle spirit has
come like oil upon the troubled waters; or what man, with his wild
passions, would have been without the ameliorating influence of the
Cross. We possibly may be able to tell, when we look across the
impassable gulf into a Gehenna beneath, and see sin unchecked working
out its dire results; and, we believe that whatever comes short of
that darkness, whose very light is darkness, is due to that light
which radiates from the Cross of Christ, and whatever is short of
hell streams from Calvary. And then, further still, we have a Bible,
a revelation filled with the love and mercy of God to mana Bible in
which our Lord himself could show, beginning at Moses, and in all the
prophets, that which did testify concerning himself; and, apart from
Jesus Christ and his death, there could have been no such revelation
of God's character unto the human race. A revelation there might have
been, but it would have been a revelation of Sinai's horrors and
terrors, without even the spark of hope which comes forth from that
dispensation there set forth. There might have been a revelation, I
say, but it would have been a revelation that would not have wound up
as this does with a blessing. It would have ended like the Old
Testament with a curse; it would have begun with the same. It would
have been worse than Ezekiel's roll of woes which is filled all over
with terrible lamentation, and with awful sorrow and woe. And again,
there is a positive overture of mercy, a true and faithful
declaration of good tidings unto every creature, and we do believe
that it is our duty to preach the Gospel unto every creature; and the
Gospel runs thus"Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be
saved, for he who believeth and is baptized shall be saved." That
overture we hold to be no mockery, but made in good faith; and that
overture is not the overture of a shadow, but the presentation of
solid, substantial blessings; and for the rejection of that, not God,
but man is answerable, and for the rejection of that he will be lost.
"For this the condemnation, that they have not believed on him whom
God hath sent." And, then, lastly, we find that as the purchase of
the death of Christ there is a Church, and that Church is sent forth
into the world with orders to bless it and to do good unto all men.
It is bidden to go forth as a light in the midst of darkness; it is
bidden so to live as to be the salt of the whole earth. Now, we say
that each one of these blessings is no small gift from God to manno
mean result of the death of our Master; and, combined, we think they
would form a boon worthy of a God; and, as we put our hand upon it,
we think we can give a full and true expression, and with an emphasis
surpassed by none, to that glorious text"God so loved the world
that he gave his only begotten Son." And we think, upon our system,
and upon ours alone, we can give full truthfulness and emphasis to
the remainder"That whosoever believeth in him shall have
everlasting life." Now, upon redemption proper, the latter part of
our theme, we will pass on to speak. And, first, what do we mean by
redemption? Most certainly we do not mean the POSSIBILITY OF
REDEMPTION, for we have learned to distinguish between the
possibility of a thing and a thing itself. We feel this, that we do
not preach and cannot preach, gathering our teaching from the Bible,
a possibility of redemption. We proclaim a redemption. Nor do we mean
by redemption a contingency of redemption, which, again, is
contingent upon a third thing. We have learned to distinguish between
a contingency and a certainty. We proclaim a certain redemption, and
we speak of that which is not possible but positive, not contingent
but certain. Neither do we mean by redemption such an outgrowth of
the man's own power or goodness as shall enable him to burst his way
through every bondage and to get forth free; such an elevation of
human nature, whether by the education of others, or by his own
works, as to enable him at last to stand free. If we meant that, we
should use the word escape, but not the word redemption. And again,
if we meant, as some, alas! have seemed to mean, God's foregoing his
claim upon man; God's waiving man's liabilities, and God's giving up
that which we believe, as a holy God, he cannot surrender; if we
meant that, we should speak of emancipationof pure pardon and
forgiveness. But we do not. We mean redemption. And then, again, we
do not mean by redemption the meeting of the debts, either in
prospective or in the present. We do not mean that the man shall,
either in the present or in the future, bear any part of the penalty;
and, by some goodness, either in the present or foreseen, satisfy
God's claim upon him. If we meant that, I think we should use
altogether another word than the word redemption. What do we mean by
redemption? We mean, by redemption, the work of one being which is
done for another, but generally a helpless one, in order to give him
a perfect freedom. And when we speak of redemption, mark you, we
speak of a thing that is the result of that work. We distinguish
between redemption and redemption work. What we mean, by redemption,
is just thisthe grand result and end of the work of our Lord Jesus
Christ; and we could as well speak of redemption apart from the
redeemed, as we could speak of life apart from a living creature.
Life and living creatures are co-extensive, and so is redemption and
the redeemed. If you take down any book that will give you an
explanation of the word "redemption," I think you will find three
things put therein. It is a ransom, a rescue, and a release. Now, I
take the whole three words to be the fulness of the meaning of one
word. It is such a ransom, and such a rescue, as result in a complete
and full release. Whatever stops short of that thing, is, of course,
not the thing itself; the thing itself that we mean, is the
positively being redeemed and made free. Now, just by way of
simplifying the subject, let me speak of the Redeemer, and of the
redemption work, and of those who are redeemed.
First, the Redeemer, who is he? We
believe him to be the Word that was with God, equal unto God, and was
God, who became flesh and dwelt among us. At the same time, the
flesh did not become, in any sense, Deity, neither did the Deity, in
any sense, become carnal. They formed another person, and that person
the God-man, Jesus Christ, our Redeemer. Now, what is he? And here I
just ask that question, in order to meet some objections, and, if I
can, to put on one side two or three theories that seem to fight
against ours. I hear a voice, saying, in reply to that question, what
is he? Why, he is God's idea of humanity; he is God, who has taken up
humanity from its fallen state, raised it up not only to the place
where he first put it, but, beyond, even to the height to which he
hoped it would ascend, or possibly something beyond it. And, now,
from henceforth, such is the union betwixt common humanity, that the
lost, in their degradation, have but to look to their common humanity
exalted, realize their identity with it, and to feel themselves, by
that deed, raised to the same standard, and redeemed, and free for
evermore. To which, we reply, there is enough of truth in that lie to
keep it alive, and that is all. We do believe that our Master did lay
hold of humanity; we do believe that he has honoured and dignified
the human race, by taking that upon him, and by becoming flesh like
unto ourselves. But we cannot see how that the gazing upon that can
open blind eyes, unstop deaf ears, give live to the dead, and procure
the discharge of our sins, any more than we can see how that the
gazing upon an Olympic game would give to the physically lame,
physical strength, or could give to those who were physically dead,
life from their physical death.
And, again, I hear other voices replying
to that question. They say, "he is the great example of self-denial,
and of the submission of the human will to the Divine. And what
redemption is, is thisthat man now can look to that great display
of selfdenial, can catch of its spirit, and can imitate it, and by
that deed of subjection, making the will to succumb to the will of
the Divine, they may, at least, emancipate themselves, and go forth
free." To which we reply, once more, there is enough of truth in that
just to cement the error together, and to give it a plausible
appearance to the sons of men, but there is nothing more. It is true
that our Saviour was the Sent One of the Father. It is true, he came,
saying, "Lo! I come to do thy will." He declares he was not doing his
own will, but the will of him that sent him. And he winds up by
saying, "Not my will, but thine be done." But, after all, we cannot,
and dare not accept that submission of Christ's will to the Father,
as being a satisfaction for sin; neither can we see, how, by the
imitation of that, we can, in any sense, wipe away the sins of the
past, or free ourselves from the penalty that is yet to come.
But now to answer for ourselves. What is
our Lord Jesus Christ? And we say, that in life he is the great
example and copy; in death, he is the substitute; and in both, the
federal headthe elder brother and kinsman of his Church.
But now time warns me that I must pass
on to the second thoughtthe work of redemption. First of all, we
gaze at that part of the work which is Godward, and that we call
atonement; and, when you ask meWhat is the character of the
atonement? I replyIt has a twofold nature, to correspond with the
twofold character of sin. Sin is a transgression of the law, and a
consequent insult to him who is the lawmaker. But it is something
more than that: the power by which he has transgressed has been
perverted; it was given to him to obey the law that he might glorify
God. And to make, therefore, a satisfaction for sin, there must be a
bringing to the law obedience; there must be the bearing of the
sanction because of the disobedience; there must be the rendering to
God the glory due to him; and there must be the bearing of his just
displeasure and the expression of his holy wrath and indignation.
That Christ has done: he came, and his whole life was obedience to
the law, for he was obedient even unto death; and in that death he
bore the sanction of the lawfor he was made a curse, it being
written, "Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree." His whole life
was spent to glorify God, and at its close he could say, "I have
glorified thee, and I have finished the work which thou gavest me to
do:" and his death was the bearing of the just displeasure of God
towards the sinner, and in the agony of his heart he cried, "My God,
my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" In these things we behold,
therefore, the presentation of the obedience due, the giving to God
the glory due, the bearing of God's displeasure, and the enduring of
the curse of the law. And now the question would be put to me as to
the value of atonement. We believe that its value depends not so much
upon the Being appeased, nor upon the beings to be atoned for, as
upon the Being who makes the atonement. The value of Christ's
atonement is the value of himself. He gave himself for us. If he had
stood as the surety for the whole world, he could not be more. He
gave himself; what more could he bestow? The value of the atonement
is the value of our Lord Jesus Christ. In his flesh he can take man's
place, and by his Divinity he can give, and must give anyhow, an
infinite value to the work that he, in mortal flesh, performs. For
one soul, therefore, it must be infinitefor more or less it cannot
be. Infinite it is, and infinite it must be, and we have no part or
parcel with those who would say, that if Judas was to have been
saved, Judas' amount of penalty would have had to have been paid, in
addition to what has been borne and paid by Christ. He took the
place, the room, and stead of the church, and then all that he was
worth went in that church's place and stead. More he could not do, if
he had taken the place of the whole world. But, you ask me, is there
any limit to the atonement at all? I say I think there is; and the
limit seems to be, not in the value, but in the purpose. The limit
seems to be this theoryfor whom did he die? in whose place and
stead did he stand? If he stood in the place and stead of the whole
world, then he made atonement for the sins of the whole world, and
the whole world will be saved. If he stood in the place and stead of
his Church, then he made atonement for his Church, and the whole
Church will be saved. We believe that Christ took the place and stead
of every believer, that the believer's sin was put on him, and thus
the ex-sinner can go forth free. But I hear a voice saying, "I
challenge substitution, and I object to that." So be it. I ask you,
did Christ die for sin at all? It must be answered,Yes. Then for
whose sin did he die? If his own, then he suffered righteously. Did
he die for the sins of the whole world? then justice cannot demand
this again. Did he die for part of the sins of the whole world? then
the rest of the sins will still condemn the world; then must have
Christ died in vain. We believe that he took all the sins of some
men. It was not a fictitious condemnation; it was not a fancy sin
made for the occasion; it was a positive sin that had been committed
by God's people, and is transferred from them to him who laid down
his life for his sheep; loving us, and giving himself for and in the
stead or in the place of his people.
But, then, we say this work of
redemption comprised something more than thus paying down the ransom,
and the bearing of the penalty. It is, moreover, a rescue; for sin
has not only made men this to have insulted God and broken God's law,
it has transferred them unto bondage under the allegiance of
one"the strong man armed." They must be freed from that. Christ
came, has destroyed death, and through death him also who has the
power of death, even the devil; making an open show of them upon his
cross, ascending up on high a victor, leading captivity captive. And
then, I think, there is yet something further. Sin has affected the
man himself, made him to need in his own person a releasing from the
dominion, power, and corruption of sin. This Christ has secured by
his covenant with the Father. But that which I take to comprise
effectual calling and final perseverance, I shall leave to my
brethren who shall speak afterwards. And now as to the persons
redeemedwho are they? The Church, we say, whether you look at the
Church as elect from all eternity, or the Church believing in time,
or the Church as glorified hereafter. We look at them all as one, and
we say these are the redeemed, these are they for whom redemption has
been procured. We cannot add to their number, we cannot diminish
them; for we believe that those whom God foreknew, he did
predestinate; that those whom he did predestinate, he also called:
for whom he calls he justifies, for whom he justifies he also
glorifies; the whole are one,and for these redemption has been
made.
Now, if I may be permitted the time, I
will just touch upon one or two, objections, and then I will
conclude. I hear some one saying, "But by that, sir, you surely must
limit God's love." I reply, is God loving when he punishes any and
doth not save all? Then is he loving also when he purposes to do
that, for whatever justifies the deed justifies the purpose which
gives the morality to the deed. And then I hear another
objection"How can you, sir, upon that theory, go to preach the
Gospel unto every creature?" You have heard that answeredwe have
got the order; but, I reply yet further: I could not go and preach
the Gospel upon any other theory, for I dare not go on that fool's
errand of preaching a redemption that might not redeem, and declaring
a salvation that might not save. I could not go and say to a man,
"Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved." And he
would answer me, "Do you think you are going to heaven?" "Yes."
"Why?" "Because Christ died for me." "But he died for us all, and my
chances therefore are as good as yours." And he might reply to me
after he had accepted my declaration, and after he had believed, and
begun to rejoice, after all he might say, "Is there any real reason
why I should rejoice, some for whom Christ died are in hell, and I
may also go there. I cannot begin to rejoice in your news till I feel
myself in glory. It is rather a faulty piece of good news, because it
is nothing positive; it is a grand uncertainty you have proclaimed to
me." Now, what we preach, is the Gospel to every creature, and that
we take to be thisIf you believe on the Lord Jesus Christ you shall
be saved; if you do not, you will be lost, and lost for ever. You are
not redeemedyou are not saved,there is not, in another word,
salvation and redemption for those who are lost for ever. But we add,
"We are what we are by Divine grace; we have believed; if you believe
on the Lord Jesus Christ you will be as we arewill be able to boast
as we do, humbly in the Lord our God;" or in other wordsIf you
believe, and are baptized, you will be saved; if you do not believe,
you will be lost, and lost for ever.
EFFECTUAL CALLING
BY THE
Rev. JAMES SMITH
OF CHELTENHAM.
My Christian friends, our minds have
been occupied to-day with some of the loftiest subjects that can
engage the thoughts of man. Our attention has been directed to the
infinitely wise and true God, and we have been endeavouring to
conceive of him as the great, the infinite, the eternal; the great,
the infinite, the eternal intellect, who, of himself, conceiveth the
grandest schemes, and infallibly provides for their accomplishment,
so that there can be no mistake, no failure. We know that every wise
intellect forms its plan before it provides its mean, or attempts to
carry out the idea conceived in the mind.
And the great doctrine of election, to
which our attention was directed this afternoon, answers to the
formation of the plan in the infinite mind of God. He foresaw,
clearly, that the whole human race, represented by the first man,
would fall into sin, and left to themselves, would certainly perish.
To prevent a catastrophe so fearful, he determined in his infinite
mind, to have a people for himself, a people that would comprise the
vast majority of the fallen inhabitants of this world. They were all
present before his mind; their names were registered in his book,
which book was delivered into the hands of the Lamb, the Son of God,
who accepted the book at the hands of his Father, and, as it were,
signed it with his own name, so that it has been designated, "The
Book of Life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world." And
Jesus looked upon this act as the committing of the people to
himself, on purpose that he might take the charge of them, on purpose
that he might carry out the Father's will respecting them, and gain
eternal laurels and honours to himself, by placing them in splendor,
majesty, and glory before his Father's face for ever. We therefore
find him frequently when speaking with his Father, and referring to
this act in the eternal counsels, saying, "Thine they were and thou
gavest them me. Keep those whom thou hast given me by thine own name,
that they may be one as we are." But election interferes not with man
as standing in Adam, but with man as under sin the result of Adam's
fall. It ensured their restoration, but it did not interfere with
their fall, and consequently the elect, with the rest, all fell in
the first man. The entire mass of human nature became depraved,
polluted, rotten to the heart's core; so depraved, so polluted, so
rotten, that nothing could effect a change but the omnipotent energy
of the omnipotent God. There is that in depravity in every form, that
defies the touch of any one but the Infinite; that refuses to succumb
to anything but to Omnipotence itself. The heart of man is foul as
the heart of Satan; the nature of man is foul as the nature of Satan;
and the sin of man is worse than the sin of Satan. Satan, the great
archangel, that fell from heaven, did a tremendous deed when he set
mind in opposition to Deity; but man set not merely mind, but matter
with mind, in opposition to the eternal God. God could once look upon
the world and say, "Though mind is in rebellion, matter is not in
opposition;" but after the fall of man, mind and matter alike were
corrupt, were depraved, were in opposition to the Eternal. Every
man's heart steams with enmity against God; every man's spirit rises
in rebellion against God; and, as you have heard tonight, the verdict
of every man's conscience in its fallen state is, "No God, no God;"
and if the Eternal could be voted out of existence by the suffrages
of his fallen creatures, every hand would be up, every heart would
give its verdict, and every voice would vote for the annihilation of
the Most High. The will of man strong, the will of man stern, the
will of man determined, and opposed to the will of God, will yield to
nothing but that which is superior to itself; it laughs at authority,
it turns with disgust from holiness, it refuses to listen to
invitation, and, in this state, manuniversal man, is found. In this
state, man, the entire mass of man, with the exception of those who
had been saved on credit, and had been changed by the sacred
influences of the Spiritin this state man was found when Christ
came into our world. He came and, as ye have heard, assumed humanity,
and united it with Deity. The two natures constituted the one person
of the glorious Mediator; that glorious Mediator stood the
representative of his people; that Mediator stood the Surety of his
family; that Mediator stood the Substitute of the multitude of his
fallen ones. That Mediator came to be the sacrifice to which sin was
to be transferred, by which sin was to expiated and removed out of
the way, that God's mercy might freely flow, and from the sinner's
conscience, that he might have peace and joy.
But as the election of the Father did
not interfere with the falling of man's nature, so the redemption of
the Son did not change the nature that had fallen. It was therefore
necessary, that as the Father sent the Son, the Son should send the
Comforter; and as it required an infinite victim to atone for man's
guilt, it required an infinite agent to change man's fallen nature.
As to the Father, the atonement must be made as the moral governor,
as the maintainer of the rights of the eternal throne; so from the
Father, through the Son, must the Holy Spirit descend to renew, to
transform, to remodel, to fit human nature to gaze upon the unveiled
glories of Deity, and to render to God the homage due unto his name.
And this just brings me to my pointEFFECTUAL CALLING. This implies,
that there is a calling that may not be effectual. Yes, there is a
call that extends to the whole human family. As it is written, "Unto
you, O men, I call, and my voice is unto the sons of men." There is a
call that refers to humanity as sinful, and to sinners as such,
however fallen and depraved they may be. Repentance or a change of
mind, repentance and remission of sins, are to be preached amongst
all nations, and the disciples were to begin at Jerusalem; and,
beginning at Jerusalem the slaughter-house of the Son of God, and the
slaughter-house of the prophets, and of the saints,beginning there,
they said, "Repent and be converted, that your sins may be blotted
out when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the
Lord." But the people were like the deaf adder that stoppeth her ear,
and refuseth to hear the voice of the charmercharm he never so
wisely. The Baptist had come and cried, "Repent," and sternly, and
impressively he preached, but they paid little regard,at least,
little regard that tended to life. And the Son of God, with all that
was soft, and winning, and captivating, came and preached; but they
turned away, and he said, "To whom shall I like the men of this
generationthey are like unto children sitting in the markets, and
calling to their fellowsWe have piped unto you, but ye have not
danced, and we have mourned unto you, but ye have not lamented." Now,
this call must be given, because God commands it; this call must be
given, because God works by it. In giving the general, the universal
call to all that hear the gospel, we obey the high mandate of the
Eternal God; we do honour and homage to the authority of the Lord
Jesus Christ, and we employ an instrumenta weapon, if you
pleaseby which the Spirit of God operates upon the human mind; for
the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but are mighty through
God, to the pulling down of strongholds, and the casting down of
imaginations, and every high thing, and the bringing into subjection
every thought to the obedience of Christ. The general call leads to
the special, to the particular, or what we designate, the "effectual
call." We speak to me as men, and we reason with them; we speak to
sinners as sinners, and we expostulate with them; but while we
reason, and while we expostulate, we have the promise of the presence
of the Master"I am with you;" we have the promised presence of the
Eternal Paraclete, who was sent to empower, sent to accompany, and
sent to work by the Lord's servants; and, while we speak and give the
call as we are commanded and commissioned, the Holy Spirit worksthe
infinite power of the Eternal Spirit comes into contact,direct,
immediate contact, with the mind of man. There is a power that goes
with the worddistinct from the wordwhen it is accompanied by the
energy of the Eternal Spirit; and that power produces in the heart,
lifea spiritual, a Divine, an immortal lifea life that man dead
in sin had not; a life which a man once having loseth not, for it is
eternal; a life that was given us in Christ before the world was; a
life preserved for us by Christ all through the past ages that have
rolled away; a life that is communicated from the loving heart of Him
who is the great depository of grace, and conducted by the Holy Ghost
into the heart that is called by grace. Has the Spirit accompanying
the word produced life? From that life springs conviction: not the
cold conviction awakened occasionally in the mind of man, by the
reasoning of man, by reflecting upon his past misconduct, or by the
flashing of the forked lightnings of the law; but a conviction that
is produced by the Holy Spirit bringing the law into contact with the
consciencethe Gospel into contact with the heart. In the sinner's
conscience God erects a tribunal, in the sinner's conscience God sits
as judge, and to the tribunal, before the just judge, man is summoned
to appear; and in the heart, in the soul, in the nature of man, there
is a miniature of the judgment that is to take place at the
completion and winding up of the present dispensation. The man is
arraigned as a sinner, the man is convicted as a culprit, the man is
condemned as a criminal; he stands before God, and he has nothing to
say; every excuse has withered like the leaves of autumn, every
excuse is carried away like the chaff from the summer's
threshing-floor, every rag that the man boasted of is torn from him,
and he stands, a naked sinner, before a heart-searching God. The
penetrating eye of the Omniscient darts into the innermost recesses
of his soul, and the gentle fingers of the Spirit turns over one fold
of the heart after the other; the process may be long, or the
operation may be quick, but sooner or later the man is brought to
this."In me, that is in my flesh, dwelleth no good thing." He had
once started at the Scriptural representation of man's fallen and
depraved nature; he had once wondered that from the lip of truth had
proceeded the startling words, "From within, out of the heart,
proceed murders, adulteries, blasphemies, false witnesses, and
abominable idolatries." He never could have thought that evil so
dreadful, he never could have thought that sins so fearful, he never
could have thought that principles so diabolical, could have been
found in a nature like his; but there they are, and he has nothing to
objectbut, under the power of the deep conviction that is produced,
he is filled with terrible alarm. If he casts his eye back, there are
the crimes of his life; if he casts his eye forward, there is the
tremendous judgment; if he lifts up his eyes to Heaven, there is the
pure and holy God that he has insulted; and if he turns his eyes
within, all is dark and vain and wild. He is filled with alarmalarm
that perhaps keeps him awake by night, and haunts and harasses him by
day, until he is prepared to do anything, prepared to go anywhere, if
he may but escape the just judgment of his God. He is by this
discipline prepared to submit to God's method of salvation; he is
prepared to give up proposing conditions according to which he would
be saved; he no longer goes about to work out a righteousness of his
own, but he is ready to submit himself to the righteousness of God.
Being, therefore, conscious of his criminality, burdened with his
guilt, trembling at the prospect of his destiny, he falls prostrate
before the high throne of the Eternal, smites upon his breast, and
cries "God be merciful to me a sinner," as if no such a sinner had
ever appealed to God's mercy, as if no such culprit had ever stood
before God's throne; before God he says, "If there can be mercy in
thy heart sufficient to reach a case so dismal and so desperate, God
be merciful to me;" and after having pleaded with earnestness, after
having supplicated with intense emotion, and after having, perhaps,
become a little bold, he is startled at his own temerity, and
receding, as it were, from the position that he had taken, he cries
"Depth of mercy, can there be
Mercy in thy heart for me,
O God of spotless purity?"
And, perhaps, like David, he groans in
his heart, and mourns in his soul, until his bones wax old, through
his roaring all the day long. But, no relief, no help is found,
until, at length, he begins to make confession of his sin, and, as he
confesses, the Spirit of God unveils and unfolds the gospel mystery,
and, as in the days of the law, when the victim was brought to the
Priest, and the man placed his hand upon its head, between its horns,
and pressed with his might and confessed over it all his
transgressions, all his iniquities, and all his sins, so the man lays
his hand of faith upon the victim's head, and there confesses his
sin. As he confesses, a change takes place in his feelings, the
burden begins to disperse, a little bright light in the cloud
attracts his attention, and, as he looks upward, he seems to catch
the loving Father's eye, and feels an encouragement within him to
approach unto God; and, as he approaches, still confessing, still
pleading, still deploring, still resting his hand upon the victim's
head, and trusting in the atonement you have heard of, and on that
alone, he seems to hear strange music, delightful melody, and that
music is the commencement of the sound of the trump of the Jubilee,
when the oppressed one is to go free, and as he listens to the sound
the chains drop from his hands, and the burden from his shoulders,
the trouble is removed from his heart, and he lifts up his eyes,
streaming perhaps with tears, to heaven, and says, "Oh Lord, I will
praise thee, for though thou wast angry with me, thine anger is
turned away, and thou comfortest me:" and looking around, on those
about him, in the language of wonder, astonishment, and gratitude, he
says, "Behold, behold a mystery, behold a miracle, behold one of the
greatest wonders of the universe; behold, God is my salvation. I will
trust, and not be afraid, for Jah Jehovah is my strength, and my
song, he also is become my salvation." He has now peace flowing into
his heart like a river, he has now a consciousness that God has
accepted him in the beloved, and he now experimentally knows the
truth, tastes the sweetness, and feels the power of the apostolic
testimony, "Being justified by faith we have peace with God, through
our Lord Jesus Christ; by whom also we have access into this grace,
wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God." He has
now experienced the effectual call. It has been a call from darkness
into marvellous light, from bondage into glorious liberty; out of
prison the man comes to reign; from the dunghill he is lifted up to
sit among the princes, even among the princes of God's people. And,
now, as I must conclude, just observe, the origin of this call is the
free, the sovereign, the distinguishing grace of God. It originates,
not in man's will, nor in man';s disposition, nor in man's station in
society, but of His will, and of His will alone, who is the great
sovereign ruler of the universe, is this change effected; of man it
cannot be, for it includes a new creation; a resurrection; and the
inhabitants of God. Generally speaking, the instrumentality by which
God works is the gospel, but in every instance the agent that
produces the change is the holy and eternal Spirit of God. He
quickens the soul dead in trespasses and sins, he enlightens the
understanding that was in the midnight darkness of nature, he
disposes the will which before ran counter to the will of God; he
teaches the understanding that was once averse to everything pure and
holy, and then gently, and lovingly, and sweetly he leads the soul to
the Cross to gaze upon the wondrous Sufferer, he then leads the soul
to the Church to confess Christ and him crucified, and then leads it
in the paths of righteousness for his own name's sake. The calling is
high, for it is from the High and Holy One; it is heavenly, in
contrast with the earthly calling of the descendants of Abraham of
old; it is an evidence of distinguishing love; and thanks, eternal
thanks to God, it is irreversible; for the gifts and the callings of
God are without repentance. From death to life we pass; from darkness
into light we come; out of bondage into liberty we spring; from sin
to the knowledge and enjoyment of holiness we are introduced; then at
last from earth to heaven. Into the grace of Christ we are called,
and we stand in his favour. Into the fellowship of Christ we are
called, and when Christ who is our life shall appear, we also shall
appear with him in glory. The Father draws; the Spirit quickens; the
Son receives; and when locked in the arms of the Son of God, our
effectual calling is realized and enjoyed. Its author, is God; its
subjects, are the elect; its nature, is holy; and its end, is
glorious. Thus, you perceive, my friends, all originated in God's
thought, which thought sprung into a perfect plan, to carry out which
plan provision was made, and this plan will be perfectly carried out
to the praise of the glory of his grace. Thus, whether you think of
election, whether you think of redemption, or whether you think of
effectual calling,
"Give all the glory to his holy name,
For to him all the glory belongs;
Be your's the high joy still to sound forth his praise
And crown him in each of your songs."
The REV. C. H. SPURGEON.I think it was
John Newton, who, speaking about good Calvinistic doctrine compared
it to lumps of sugar; but he said, he did not so much give to his
people the lumps of sugar, as diffuse the whole of it throughout his
sermons; just as people do not eat sugar, but put it in their tea.
Now, some of you have not yet grown patient enough to listen, I
think, to a doctrine, however fully it may be brought out. Our people
want anecdotes, illustrations, parables, and metaphors; even the best
and sublimest things keep our minds on such a stretch when we listen
to them, that there is good need that illustrations should yield us
some relief. To-day was set apart that these doctrines might be fully
brought out; this has been done, and there remains but one, and that
my friend Mr O'Neil is to take, namely the final perseverance of the
saints. Before he speaks, just one or two words. Has it never struck
you that the scheme of doctrine which is called Calvinistic has much
to say concerning God? It commences and ends with the Divine One. The
angel of that system stands like Uriel in the sun; it dwells with
God; he begins, he carries on, he perfects; it is for his glory and
for his honour. Father, Son, and Spirit co-working, the whole Gospel
scheme is carried out. Perhaps there may be this defect in our
theology; we may perhaps too much forget man. I think that is a very
small fault, compared with the fault of the opposite system, which
begins with man, and all but ends with him. Man is a creature; how
ought God to deal with him? That is the question some theologians
seem to answer. The way we put it isGod is the Creator, he has a
right to do as he wills; he is Sovereign, there is no law above him,
he has a right to make and to unmake, and when man hath sinned, he
has a right to save or to destroy. If he can save, and yet not impair
his justice, heaven shall ring with songs; if he destroy, and yet his
goodness be not marred, then hell itself with its deep bass of
misery, shall swell the mighty rollings of his glorious praise. We
hold that God should be most prominent in all our teachings; and we
hold this to be a gauge by which to test the soundness of ministers.
If they exalt God and sink the sinner to the very dust, it is all
well; but if they lower the prerogatives of Deity, if he be less
sovereign, less just, or less loving than the Scripture reveals him
to be, and if man be puffed up with that fond notion that he is
anything better than an unclean thing, then such theology is utterly
unsound. Salvation is of the Lord, and let the Lord alone be
glorified.
THE FINAL PERSEVERANCE OF BELIEVERS IN CHRIST
JESUS;
BY THE
Rev. WILLIAM O'NEILL,
MINISTER OF NEW BROAD STREET CHAPEL, LONDON.
My dear Brethren and Friends.
Most unexpectedly did the kind
invitation of my esteemed brother, Mr Spurgeon, come to me, to take
part in the present service of this beautiful house. And after I had
engaged to come I sincerely wished that I had not. I felt, however,
that it would not be proper to retire from the engagement, but seek
to meet in a becoming spirit, both towards God's truth and God's
people. I will now try to do this. I utter here, of course, my own
sentiments. As I am not responsible for anything that has been or may
be said by another speaker, so I alone am responsible for what I
shall say. But though I am not the delegate or representative of any
church, denomination, or community, I doubt not that my declaration
of faith on the matter at hand will be, in all substantial points,
that of a very large number who love Jesus and are living in His
service. That I desire to believe what the Bible teaches, and that I
am sincere in my convictions, I know to be true: but that there are
thousands of excellent Christians on the other side admits of no
doubt, and should not be questioned by any one. Of their deep
sincerity, love to God and his Gospel, zeal and devotedness in holy
things, self-denying labours in the Divine service, and the
cultivation and manifestation of Christian graces, I would and do
speak with the most earnest approval. I give them as much credit for
sincerity as I claim for myself; and I do this not as a favour, but
as a piece of simple justice. Yet we differdiffer as to what the
Sacred Oracles teach on the doctrine now before us; and it is
competent and right for all men to examine, each one for himself,
which of our opinions is that which is taught in the Bible, for
certainly both are not taught there.
The questionIs it possible for sincere
Christians, truly regenerated persons, to be finally separated from
Jesus, to lose the favour of God their Father, and be eternally shut
out from His smile and Home?is one of no small moment. It involves
issues of the most momentous nature, and cannot but be unspeakably
interesting to every believer in Christ. We say, with unfaltering
tongue, that of all the dead, every one who was ever renewed in heart
is now in heaven; and that reconciliation with God on earth, through
Christ Jesus, will, in every case, end in the everlasting salvation
of the soul. Did God, then, tell us that all who are here now are His
regenerated people, (would that they were!) we should believe that
when the roll of the finally saved shall be called, every one of them
would answer to that call by saying, "Here am I, Lord: Thy right arm,
and the effectual operation of Thy Spirit and grace has done it all,
and now I am to be for ever happy, for ever sinless, for ever safe."
It is hardly necessary to say, that we believe this view of the case
to be in entire harmony with the teaching of God's Book. To the law
and to the testimony, if we, or others, speak not on this and on all
other matters according to that Word, it is because there is no light
in us or in them. (Isaiah viii. 20.)
Having called public attention to this
doctrine lately in a small book,* in which I have sought to obey the
Master's command,"Search the scriptures,"I will now, with your
kind permission, direct attention to a few portions of the Divine
Word that, we believe, fully establish the doctrine of the saints'
final preservation and perseverance. On each of those texts my words
must be few, as the time allotted to me is short.
Hear then the Holy Spirit's teaching
when speaking by the prophet Samuel:"For the LORD will not forsake
His people for His great name's sake; because it hath pleased the
Lord to make you His people." (1 Sam. xii. 22) This, we think, is
conclusive. What Christian does not know, and knowing, does not mourn
over, the untrustworthiness of his own heart? And feeling fully
assured that it is impossible for him to vanquish "the world, the
flesh, and the devil," how welcome to his heart is the declaration,
"The LORD will not forsake His people." No; He thought proper to
renew their hearts, to quicken them into spiritual life, and He will
mercifully continue to carry on His good work in their souls till it
be perfected in glory. The reason why "He will not forsake His
people" is stated here most explicitly; just as much so as is the
declaration of His unchangeable love. It is not that they were less
sinful by nature or practice than others; or because of any moral
qualities that were found in them; but "because it pleased the Lord
to make them His people." Hear another portion: God, speaking by his
prophet Isaiah, says,"Can a woman forget her sucking child, that
she should not have compassion on the son of her womb? Yea, they may
forget, yet will I not forget thee. Behold, I have graven thee upon
the palms of My hands." (Isaiah xlix. 15, 16.) This we regard as a
most interesting, as well as a most consolatory portion of Scripture.
"Zion said, the LORD hath forsaken me, and my Lord hath forgotten
me." This was not only an error in creed,it was also a
dishonourable estimate of the Divine character, and to it the
Gracious One replies in these words:"Can a woman forget her sucking
child, that she should not have compassion on the son of her womb?
Yea, they may forget, yet will not I forget thee." The affection of a
right-minded mother for her tender and helpless offspring is one of
the strongest that is experienced by human beings. But, though
strong, very strong, it may, alas! give way. It is, at best, only a
creature's love, and therefore changeable; while that love which is
exercised by God towards His believing children is, like Himself,
unchangeable. These words prove, and were designed to prove, most
conclusively, that the love of the Divine Father towards His adopted
sons and daughters is not a fluctuating or changing thing. What
other, or what lower interpretation can we put upon the words, "YET
WILL NOT I FORGET THEE?" And not forgetting them is, in this case,
equivalent to His continuing to care for, to keep, and tenderly
regard them.
Hear God again speaking by the same
prophet:"For a small moment have I forsaken thee; but with great
mercies will I gather thee. In a little wrath I hid My face form thee
for a moment; but with everlasting kindness will I have mercy on
thee, saith the LORD thy Redeemer. For this is as the waters of Noah
unto me: for as I have sworn that the waters of Noah should no more
go over the earth; so have I sworn that I would not be wroth with
thee, nor rebuke thee. For the mountains shall depart, and the hills
be removed; but My kindness shall not depart from thee, neither shall
the covenant of My peace be removed, saith the LORD that hath mercy
on thee." These words deserve to hold a prominent place among those
which God has spoken for the comfort and joy of His people. Their
obvious design isto sustain believers under the chastening hand of
God, and to do this by considerations drawn from His own character,
and not from anything in themselves. Vain, brethren, is it to trust,
or put confidence in our own false hearts. They are weak as helpless
infancy. To lean on them will only be evidence of our folly and of
our sin. We are not to find consolation in our gifts, in our graces,
in our labours, in our resolutions, or in our experience, nor by the
grace of God will we do so. But when chastised by the everloving and
good Father,when smarting under his parental and deserved
stripes,we may feast our souls on His blessed wordswords that
fire those souls with confidence, hope, and love."In a little wrath
I hid my face from thee for a moment; but with everlasting kindness
will I have mercy upon thee. For the mountains shall depart, and the
hills be removed; but My kindness shall not depart from thee, neither
shall the covenant of my peace be removed, saith the LORD that hath
mercy on thee." Such, brethren, are GOD'S utterances! These are the
words of One who is unchangeable in affection; of One who says,Oh!
blessed be his adorable name for that saying,"For I am the LORD, I
change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed." (Mal. iii.
6.)
I name another passage:"For there
shall arise," says Jesus, "false Christ's, and false prophets, and
shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch, that, if it were
possible, they shall deceive the very elect." (Matt. xxiv. 24.) The
plain and obvious meaning of this latter clause is, that it is not
possible to deceive, or allure to their final ruin, the adopted sons
and daughters of God, those whom He has chosen to be His. Nothing
less, we believe, was intended by the Gracious Speaker, and we see
not how any other meaning can be consistently given to the language
which He here uses. The words, "If it were possible," only say, in
another form, "It is not possible."
I now name such texts as connect faith,
or believing in Christ, with salvation, of which the following are a
few:"God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son,
that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have
everlasting life." "Verily, verily, I say unto you, he that heareth
My word, and believeth on Him that sent Me, hath everlasting life,
and shall not come into condemnation, but is passed from death unto
life." "And this is the will of Him that sent Me, that every one
which seeth the Son, and believeth on Me hath everlasting life. I am
the bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread
he shall live for ever." "The Gospel is the power of God unto
salvation to every one that believeth." (John ii. 16, v. 24, vi. 47,
50, 51, 57; Rom. i. 16.) The plain teaching of these, and many
similar passages, is, that every believer in Jesus hath everlasting
life. They teach this or they teach nothing. Is this be not their
meaning, what is? But, can that which is everlasting cease to be? Can
it come to an end? No words can more plainly assert than these do,
that whosoever believeth in Jesus SHALL NOT COME INTO CONDEMNATION;
that all believers in him shall enjoy "everlasting life." We take
these gracious assurances as proving, to the fullest extent, the
doctrine for which we plead. If the belief of the Gospel be not
followed, in every instance, by eternal blessedness, what did Paul
mean when he said, "The Gospel is the power of God unto salvation to
every one that believeth?" (Rom. i. 16.) If, at the last day, a
single one be unsaved of those who had believed the Gospel, who had
been united to Christ by faith in His namethe apostle's words must
needs be falsifiedhis teaching is not true. This, at least, is our
opinion. No amount of adverse criticism can set aside the evidence
that such verses as these furnish in support of the blessed doctrine
which we now defend.
Hear Christ again:"My sheep," he says,
"hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me: and I give unto
them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any one
pluck them out of My hand. My Father who gave them Me is greater than
all; and no one is able to pluck them out of My Father's hand." We
regard this entire passage as one of the most delightful and
consoling in the Scriptures. It teaches most unequivocally,in the
plainest, strongest, and most conclusive terms,that Christ's
believing ones "SHALL NEVER PERISH;" that no enemy, human or hellish,
shall be able to wrench them out of His or His Father's covenanted
and secure grasp. Infinite power, no less than infinite loveboth
existing in their God and Saviourstand guarantee for their
security! Neither men nor demons shall be able to defeat or overturn
the purpose of Divine grace concerning them! Difficulties, many and
sharp, may surround them; and temptations, fierce and fiery, may
assault their souls; but Divine love, wisdom, grace, and power shall
be ever on their side. Jesus, the "faithful and true witness," says,
"THEY SHALL NEVER PERISH." Elsewhere He says, "Because I live, ye
shall live also." (John xiv. 17) The spiritual life of believers is
in HIS keeping, and He here declares that it is as secure as His own.
If He dies, and continues not to be their "Advocate with the Father,"
(1 John ii. 1) their Intercessor "at the right hand of God," (Rom.
viii. 34) then may they die also, but not otherwise. In perfect
keeping with his Lord's words are those which Paul uses, when
referring to the same subject. "For if," he says, "when we were
enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of His Son, much
more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by His life." (Rom. v. 10)
That is, we shall be preserved in that state of reconciliation by
Christ's intercessory life at God's right hand in heaven. He, the
God-man, lives there as Mediator, for them: He holds and exercises
"all power in heaven and on earth" for the welfare and safety of His
church. And they cannot die while He lives. The power that is to
destroy the spiritual life of the weakest saint must first destroy
the life of that saint's Head. "Their life," as the Holy Spirit by
Paul elsewhere teaches, "is hid with Christ in God" (Col. iii. 3).
Where, brethren, could it be safer, or as safe? In whose care or
keeping could it be so secure? It is "hid with Christ in God." Not
only so, but the Apostle goes on to say, "When Christ, who is our
life, shall appear, then shall ye also appear with him IN GLORY."
This, to say the least of it, is a glorious statement and
declaration. Can language, we ask, go beyond that which is used in
these texts to guarantee the eternal salvation of every believer in
Jesus? The Head and members shall never be separated. They are bound
up in an inseparable and an unchanging union.
Hear a Divine lesson given in another
place:"Moreover, whom He did predestinate, them He also called; and
whom He called, them He also justified; and whom He justified, them
He also glorified" (Rom. viii. 30).
When it is said, "Whom He did
predestinate, them He also called," we must interpret the word
"called" to mean very much more than invited; for the Apostle goes on
to say, "Whom He called, them He also justified." We know that this
is only true of those who believe in Jesuswho are effectually
called or drawn, by the combined operations of the Word and Spirit of
God, into the blessed fellowship and joys of the Gospel (1 Cor. i.
9). That those, and only those, who believe in Christ are justified,
is the uniform lesson of the Divine Word (John iii. 16, 36; Acts
xiii. 39, 40; Rom. i. 16, iii. 22, 28). Let it be noted that Paul
affirms three things here. The first is"Whom He did predestinate,
them He also called." The second is"Whom He called, them He also
justified." And the third is"Whom He justified, them He also
glorified." What, then, does he mean by the expression "glorified?"
Does he, or can he mean anything less than the enjoyment of
everlasting life? We say, then, that were only a single individual
out of the whole number of those who have been, or shall be
"justified" by faith in Jesus, to come short of heaven, the
declaration would not be true that "Whom He justified, them He also
glorified."
Hear another Divine proclamation
relative to the security of God's people:"For I am persuaded that
neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers,
nor things to come, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature,
shall be able to separate us from the love of God which is in Christ
Jesus our Lord" (Rom. viii. 38, 39). These, brethren, are notes of
the most triumphant character, relative to the ultimate blessedness
of believers in Jesus. The terms which are here used are such as
leave no doubt as to what the Holy Spirit, speaking by Paul, meant to
teach. We deliberately affirm that language has no power to assert
the doctrine for which we contend more conclusively than is here
done. Words have no meaning, nor are they of any use in communicating
thought, if these words were not used by a man who believed as we do
on the matter in hand. And we are entirely willing to believe or
disbelieve with the Apostle Paul, neither more nor less.
I quote him again. Hear what he wrote to
the Church at Philippi:"Being confident of this very thing, that He
who hath begun a good work in you will perform it until the day of
Jesus Christ." I well remember how greatly this strengthened my own
soul when, in the morning of my religious life, I was passing through
much mental conflict. And are not these words well calculated to
comfort the hearts of those who, through grace, have believed in the
Saviour? Is there any room for objecting criticism here, or is there
any ambiguity in the language employed? No, there is none whatever:
the Apostle was "confident of this very thing." What "very thing?"
Why, that wherever the Divine Spirit had commenced this "good work"
of grace in the soul, He would complete it. No other power could have
begun it, and no other power is competent to carry it forward to
completion. That He who commences that "good work" is able to finish
it, no professing Christian will deny: that He will finish it, this
verse most clearly teaches. The Apostle Paul was "confident of THIS
VERY THING;" and so are we.
Let us give attention to other words of
the same sacred penman. Addressing one of the primitive Churches, he
says:"We are bound to give thanks always to God for you, brethren
beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you
to salvation, through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the
truth" (2 Thes. ii. 13). This is a most important portion of
Scripture in relation to the questionWhat is the end of election?
In what does it, or is it to terminate? What does it secure? Are its
subjects merely chosen to enjoy the light of the gospel, the means of
grace, and no more? Or, are they chosen to enjoy, in its full
measure, everlasting life; the priceless favour and blissful
fellowship of God here and for ever? This question is definitely
settled by the language of inspiration employed here. The Apostle
declares that the choice is "to salvation;" or, in other words, which
he also uses in this place, "to the obtaining of the glory of our
Lord Jesus Christ." This means, of course, eternal life in heaven, as
well as all that precedes and prepares for it on earth. But how can
this be realized? How can it be said, they were "chosen to
salvation," if they may all apostatize finally from Jesus, fall out
of the Divine favour, and be for ever numbered with the lost? The
thing is, of course, impossible. If not saved,fully and for
ever,it would not be true to say they were chosen "to
salvation."
I beg to name one passage more. Speaking
of believers, a divinely inspired teacher says:"Who are kept by the
power of God through faith unto salvation" (1 Peter, i. 5). Here we
are distinctly taught what the Divine Being is doing and will
continue to do for His believing people. The Apostle asserts, that
they are "kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation." If
so, nothing is more certain than that they shall reach it, and enjoy
it for ever. Had Peter believed that it was possible for any number
of them to become outcasts from God, and die in their sins, he would
never have employed the language which is found here. The declaration
that believers are "kept" or garrisoned in (for such is the meaning
of the term here employed) "by the power of GOD through faith unto
salvation," settles the point with us, and leaves us nothing more to
desire in the shape of statement or promise. This is, indeed, a
glorious declaration. Fellow pilgrims, let it fill you with the
highest joy, as it gives you the fullest assurance that you are safe
in the grasp and guardianship of Jehovah of hosts.
We hold and teach too, that the certain
enjoyment of everlasting life is inseparably connected with continued
faith in the Divine testimony concerning sin, Jesus, and His
salvation. They shall be preserved in the exercise of faith in the
Redeemer, until they shall enter upon the possession of the heavenly
inheritance. This is clearly taught here, and nothing less.
I have now referred to a few out of the
many portions of God's word which teach the doctrine for which we
contend. God's people shall be preserved, and will persevere to the
end, for they were given to Christ in the everlasting covenant, that
covenant which is "ordered in all things and sure:" the stability of
which is as safe as the oath, and promise, and power of God can make
it (Psalm lxxxix. 30, 34; Heb. vi. 18, 19). They are "loved by Him
with an everlasting love" (Jer. xxxi. 3); they are "chosen to
salvation" (Eph. i. 4; 2 Thes. ii. 13); and God, their gracious and
reconciled Father, "will rest in His love" (Zeph. iii. 17). Their
safety, as believers in Jesus, is secured by the word and promise of
the "God that cannot lie." He has said that He will never leave them
nor forsake them (Heb. xiii. 2); that they shall never perish" (John
x. 28); and that He will confirm them unto the end" (1 Cor. i.
8).
For this purpose the ever-availing
intercession of Jesus is employed. He is at the right hand of God as
their Brother, Representative, and Advocate. He prays for them that
their faith fail not (Luke xxii. 32). They are, each and all, borne
on His heart, and pleaded for in His gracious and ever-successful
intercession. "Father," says he, "I will that they also, whom thou
hast given Me, be with Me where I am, that they may behold My glory"
(John xvii. 24). Oh, what priceless joy do these words afford to the
believer's heart! No weapon that is formed against them shall
prosper. Their Almighty King will vanquish all their spiritual foes.
He will so aid them that they shall contend victoriously against "the
world, the flesh, and the devil." They shall be more than conquerors
through Him that loved them (Rom. viii. 37). They shall be the saved
of His right arm, and the everlasting monuments and trophies of His
grace, love, and power. They are "sealed with that Holy Spirit of
promise which is the earnest of their inheritance, until the
redemption of the purchased possession" (2 Cor. i. 21, 22; Eph. i.
13, 14). Having received the "earnest," the pledge which guarantees
the fulfilment of their Heavenly Father's covenant to save them, they
are perfectly and for ever secure.
We build our faith in this doctrine on
God's plain teaching. We extort no meaning from His word which cannot
be found there by the simple and ordinary reader of it. We take its
statements in their plain and grammatical sense, just as they would
be interpreted by any unprejudiced expounder of language. We should
be content to abide by the interpretation of them which would be
given by any man, infidel or other, who felt no interest in our
controversy, and who was entirely careless relative to our
differences of opinion. One unequivocal passage teaching this
doctrine would be, or should be sufficient to establish it, and to
bring our opinions into harmony with Divine teaching; but we are not
confined to one, or five, or ten; we have line upon line, promise
upon promise, assurance upon assurance, and declaration upon
declaration to this effect. So that we would fain ask,If the
doctrine be not taught in the portions of Scripture that I have
named, what is taught in them? What is their import? What do they
teach? Or, what language or terms would be thought sufficient to
teach it? It is our firm conviction that no doctrine of religion is
more clearly taught in the Bible than is this. It is expressed as
plainly as words can possibly do it.
And are we, with these inspired
declarations before us, to suppose it possible for wicked men or
demons to say, when pointing to numbers of the lost,"The Most High
began to build up His kingdom in their souls, but He was not able to
finish it! He quickened them into spiritual life,renewed, pardoned,
justified, and sanctified them; but now they are torn from His grasp,
His enemies were ablecontrary to the words of Jesus (1 John x.
21)'to pluck them out of His hand,' and they have done it."
This would, indeed, make short work of
many plain and positive declarations found in the Bible: it would
prove, beyond doubt, that its promises, and assurances, and
declarations are of very little value.
Let me, before I close, sayand say
with the fullest emphasis possiblethat we believe as firmly as any
man living, as firmly as we believe any truth taught in the Bible,
that "without holiness no man shall see the Lord" (Heb. xii. 14). We
know no other evidence of being in Christ, or of being a Christian,
than that which is furnished by a life and behaviour becoming the
Gospel. And though holiness is not the cause of God's first or
continued love to His people, it is the effect and fruit of that
love, and a main part of the salvation which is in Christ Jesusthat
salvation to which they are chosen (Eph. i. 4); and he who is
satisfying himself with the notion that he is safe for eternity,
while he is living in any known sin, is turning the grace of our God
into licentiousness, and is a deadly enemy of the Cross of Christ.
The blessed doctrine which the Bible teaches, and in which we glory,
isthe doctrine of the saints' final perseverance, and that doctrine
was never designed to comfort any man who is not living a life of
faith in the Son of God, intensely anxious to please God in all
things, and to be the holy and happy subject of that mind which was
in Jesus.
Very interesting, then, is the question,
when asked in no wrong spiritAre there few that be saved? If GOD
does not hold up His people, if He does not keep them by His grace
and power, they will be very few indeeda child may count them, and,
in fact, have none, not one, to count. But let no man charge our
views with being "narrow," or "embracing only a few," or
contemplating the eternal salvation of "a very limited number" of our
race, for, according to the view which we hold and teach, they will
be a numberless number. We believe, and our hearts swell with high
and holy joy in believing, that every child of man who loved
God,every one of Adam's race who was renewed in heart,all who
were ever on the Lord's side,will be found among the saved. Not one
will be lost. Not one will be missed from the eternal banquet. Not
one, will be outside the gates of the holy city. All, all shall be
there, and there for ever, and ever, and ever!
"The soul that on Jesus hath leaned for repose,
He will not, He cannot, give up to His foes;
That soul, though all hell should endeavour to shake,
He'll never! no, never! no, never forsake!"
NOTE
*Unchanging Love. Tresidder, Ave Maria Lane, London. All the texts that are usually quoted in opposition to the doctrine now noticed are passed under calm review. [Return to text.]
|